Essay Question - Discuss the reasons why stalin was able to become leader of the Soviet union 1929
Ascent of Stalin to apex of political power was neither inevitable nor unassisted
Facilitated by complex interplay of individual cunning, ideological fervour, and machinations of political undercurrents within communist party
Conquest’s portrayal of stalin as master manipulator gains credence when delving into tactical elimination of political opponents
Political landscape post Lenin = fractious, key figures Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev, competition for ideological/political ascendancy
Stalin’s initial strat. centred - strategic alliances, Trotsky, Lenin’s apparent heir was initially in a strong position but was isolated due to his intellectual arrogance and emphasis on international rather than Lenin’s testament publications
Stalin formed a triumvirate with Zinoviev, Kamenev to marginalise Trotsky, employing subtle tactics like publication of lenin’s testament which was critical of all leading members
Privy to this information before its general release, used it to coerce his allies against Trotsky
After Trotsky's decline, Stalin shifted his alliances/strats. Turning against Zinoviev/Kamenev
The 1925 party congress illustrated this transition as stalin began socialisminonecountry (deviation against Lenin’s international perspective
Stalin’s ideological shift served a dual purpose (appealed to inward focused sentiments in party and provided ideological basis for accusing Zinoviev/Kamenev of deviationism
Duumvirate with Bukharin enabled stalin to dominate party apparatus culminating in expulsion of Zinoviev/Kamenev from party 1927
Stalin’s rise in factional landscape can be understood by his control over party secretariat
Had power to appoint individuals to key positions
Seed party ranks with loyalists (patronage politics) significant impact on eventual supremacy
Pipes → substantiates view ^ stalin’s bureaucratic hold provided him with unparalleled powerbase
Stalin’s elimination of political rivals was not an exercise in brute force but masterclass in political manoeuvringsreplete with shifting alliances, astutetactical decisions
Ideological adaptability allowed him to align his philosophical stance with the mood of the party
Tactical/ideological manoeuvres were paramount, enacted in political climate that was conductive to stalin’s particular brand of leadership
Stalin’s “socialism in one country” resonated with the nation wearied by years of war/revolution
Soviet populace recovering from ravages of civil war and impact of NEP were receptive to a vision that prioritised internal stability over international revolution
Implementation of this through Five Year Plans initiated in 1928 brough change to soviet union’s agrarian society (plans aimed at rapidindustrialisation/collectivisation) pillars that promised to elevate ranks of global powers
Conquest → socio-economicmilieu significantly bolstered Stalin’s rise facilitating his claim that robustinternal policies were indispensable for defence of state
Disarray that characterised post evolutionary period created longing for stability
Conquest → prioritisation of internal policies complemented stalin’s ideological positioning, captured zeitgeist of a nation seeking socio-economic upliftment
Stalin’s vision buttressed by culture of fear, underpinned by secret police and series of purgescommenced in early 1930s
Manipulation of this climate of insecurity allowed stalin to cultivate a perception of indispensability
He was viewed as guardian of soviet ideology and state integrity
Socio-economic/political milieu of period played a role in his rise, populace exhausted with protracted instability/evolving international scene provided fertile ground for “socialism in one country”
Needs of increasingly complex state further underscored necessity for strong leadership, offering tacit enforcement for stalin’s autocratic methods
Conquest/Fitzpatrick → both internal/external dimensions that buttressed stalin's rise