Knowledge is rarely ever new. New discovery needs to rely and learn from the past
Historical context gives perspective and clarity to different concepts and subjects in Psychology
History gives unity to a broad field such as psychology
History is useful in practical application of psychology
History of psychology is interesting for our understanding of human behavior
History of psychology helps develop critical thinking in psychology students
Teaches how the field has adapted to and evolved due to political realities
Where do we start telling psychology's history?
Subject matter related to psychology dates back to ancient philosophers particularly Greek philosophers
Aristotle coined the term "Psyche" which refers to the soul
Modern Psychology was born in 1879 in Leipzig
Ebbinghaus – "Psychology has a long past but a short history"
19th century, because that is when psychology became a science and became scientific in it's methods of study – before that it was largely speculative
Definitions of Psychology
Soul Definition
Mind Definition
Consciousness Definition
Behavior Definition
Key philosophical debates in psychology's History
Mind – body debate
Nature – nurture debate
Theorist – practitioner debate
Ethics debates
Free will – determinism debate
Empiricism – rationalism debate
Historiography
Techniques and principles employed in historical research
Historians and Psychologists differ in their method of conducting research and face different challenges
Data of history and data of science differs
Data of science can be controlled and therefore replicated but the data of history cannot
History of Psychology must rely on data collection methods of history and therefore important debates in data collection and analysis came up
Presentism
Interpreting historical events using our current understanding and contemporary knowledge
Historicism
Studying past events and concepts in it's appropriate sociocultural and historical context without much interpretation
Zeitgeist
The intellectual and cultural climate or spirit of the times; including important events, economic, political and social forces
Personalistic theory
Focuses on achievements and contributions of specific individuals
Development, progress and change comes from the charisma, intellect and will of these individuals
The person makes the times
Naturalistic theory
Argues that the socio-cultural context of the times makes possible for us to recognize the person
Operates both at a cultural level and in the field as well
A discovery usually must await the proper times
People worlds apart in the same times have managed to discover the same thing
Problems in data selection: Lost data
Incomplete historical records due to lost data
Data is lost sometimes due to deliberate destruction
Sometime data is misplaced
Sometimes data is stolen
Sometimes data is deliberately altered/suppressed by others or by the theorist
Problems in data collection
Language barriers
Self-serving data
Approaching Historical Truth
Schools of thought – group of psychologists who are associated geographically or ideologically
Thomas Kuhn – preparadigmatic and paradigmatic natural science
Schools of thought: Structuralism, Functionalism, Gestalt School, Behaviorism, Psychoanalysis, Cognitive School
Presentism vs Historicism
Presentist views – do not take historical context into consideration
Example – IQ testing of immigrants (Henry Doddard)
What could be possible reasons for this?
What are the key take away points from this practice?
Internal vs External History
Internal history – written by psychologists
External history – outside influences are considered
Example – Cognitive Psychology resulted in the decline in Behaviorism?
Personalistic vs Naturalistic History
Personalistic approach – actions, events that are turning points due to an individual's contribution (eg: Darwinian biology, Freudian psychology, Newtonian physics)
Naturalistic approach – history is continuous and sleek (Boring, 1963)
Zeitgeist – intellectual and cultural climate of a particular era