Experiment: No 99, each participant did 360 trials
Trial probabilities
Centre: 0.6
Left: 0.1
Right: 0.6
Catch: 0.2
Left + right valid (valid) or invalid (invalid), 6 diff cue-target intervals, measures inhibition of return
Spatial neglect
An inability to report, respond or orient to stimuli presented on the side opposite a brain lesion not due to primary sensory or motor defects
Experiment overlap condition
1. O gap condition
2. + 100 g gap condition
La frabion cross + target on left side, cross disappings when target comes off
The more interesting something is in the middle, the less likely people are to spot the targets
Selective filtering
Putting on headphones and playing different things in each ear
Selective set experiments
Flanker task, cueing, more constrained, brief visual display, small stimulus set, response from small no. of possibilities, reaction time
If you get rid of stuff on the right side it's easier as the right side was distracting to patients with neglect
Posner et al's (1984) 3 components of visual attention
Engage attention on target
Disengage attention from target
Shift attention to new target
When 2 stimuli come up together in competition, patients tend to miss the one on left. Patients more likely to say right comes up before left even if left comes up way before right
or invalid (unand), 6 diff cue-target intervals, measures inhibition
Attention
The taking possession by mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneous possible object or trains of thought. It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others.
Attention has: Limited Capacity, Competition → Something louder or more interesting will steal your attention, and bias
When paper is turned around, left side becomes right. Patients can follow with fingers but if they look up they can't find it again
A normal person might start crossing out on left corner and go across, but people with neglect start on right, it gets messy as time goes on
Up to 80% strokes lead to spatial neglect
Spatial neglect can affect parietal lobe
Comes following damage of a range of areas
58% of stroke survivors regain independence
82% walk independently (with or without aid) -> most recovery in first 2 months, loss recovery at 4-5 months, little further recovery expected at 6 months
Neglect leads to increased levels of disability, poorer outcome, longer stays in hospital, increased chance of needing long-term care
Someone with neglect might have difficulty following obstacle courses - can't plan routes, make same mistakes each time, have trouble avoiding obstacles
To test for neglect: Star Cancellation task - often only right side crossed out
Copying tasks - devoid of left side in copy
Judgements (line bisections) -> bisected 3/4 towards the right (lesion on right so can't see left side)
Rehabbing wheelchair navigation in patients with neglect
The critically driven intervention shows promise and may be useful in training sessions
They limit normal top-down requirement of cueing approaches
Not for everybody - can't predict who will respond
Motor neglect
Favourable use of right hand, left hand not used
Anosognosia
Woman ties undoing a belt as if left hand is holding it, but it isn't, so she can't open it
Doorway accuracy test
Go towards one side
Caloric stimulation
Can help them become more oriented to the left side
Prism adaptation
1. Practice moving hand from dot to dot when visual field shifted right, body recalibrates vision over time
2. When visual field is reset, right side is missed because body still calibrated to left
3. Crosses more targets on the right than before adaptation
4. Person misses right side of target, adaptation occurs, person reaches further to the left
Cognitive testing in real world
Line bisections get smaller, Crossover effect, guessing occurs