Genetic theories

Cards (12)

  • Twin studies -this theory is about proving the criminal gene that’s passed down , theorists believe this is why criminals have criminal relatives . Monozygotic twins share the same DNA so if there was a ‘criminal gene’ both twins in theory should be criminals if there is a genetic link in criminality .
  • Twin studies research :
    Christiansen studies 3586 twins , found 52% concordance between MZ twins - meaning if one twin had a conviction the other was a 52% the other twin would have one as well. Among DZ twins there was only 22% concordance
    -the research suggests a genetic link
  • Twin studies strengths :
    • Natural experiments as biological relationships are naturally occurring
    • supporting evidence (52% concordance)
  • Twin studies weaknesses:
    • Early studies weren’t controlled as they Guessed if the twins were MZ or DZ by appearance not genetics (1920s)
    • Samples were small , lack population validity
    • twins were brought up in the same environment so criminality could be nurture not nature
  • Adoption studies - compare adopted children to birth parents and adopted parents . This is to discover whether genetics or environment have more of an effect on criminality .
  • Adoption studies research:
    Mendick et al examined 14,000 adopted sons . They found sons were more likely to have a criminal record if a birth parent has a criminal record (20% concordance) with adopted parents (14.7% concordance)
    -suggests genetics have more of an affect on criminality but environment still has a part to play as genetics isn’t’t 100% concordant.
  • Adoption studies strengths:
    • children are exposed to different environment to birth parents , it’s much easier to separate environmental and genetic factors -increases validity as research is clearer
    • studies conclude a correlation between adopted child and birth parent eg: if birth mother had record 50% children would have one before their 18.
  • Adoption studies weaknesses :
    • children can be adopted at any age before 18 - they could’ve already learnt criminal behaviour from bparents
    • info about biological family isn’t always available
    • the adoption process isn’t always random , children can be placed with adopted parents similar to biological - they’d have similar values so could influence criminal behaviour in the same way.
  • Jacob’s XYY - abnormality of the sex hormones cause criminality , and extra Y chromosome is names ‘super male syndrome’ . Men with this tend to be well-built , tall ,low intelligence .
    Jacob et al claimed XYY men are more aggressive
  • XYY research :
    Jacob suggested XYY men were more aggressive/violent . Jacob found 7 cases of XYY men in a study of 197 individuals in a mental hospital.
    -some issues with this as we’d expected a higher chance of XYY in mental hospitals than in the population - sample is small so lack population validity
  • XYY strengths :
    • support - Jacob found more XYY men in prison than XY , suggests link between it and criminality
    • Alder et al indicated aggressive behaviour is at least partially determined by genetic factors
  • XYY weaknesses :
    • studies found genetic abnormalities are widespread throughout population , not confined to prisoners
    • theory focuses too heavily on genetics , ignores environment - studies show both cause criminality
    • Theilgaard researched traits of XYY men and XY men , found aggression isn’t just associated with XYY men.