When previous crimes are analysed in order to create a profile of a likely offender. However this relies on the inutition and the beliefs of the profiler
A profile of the offender is constructed and the description is used to work out a strategy to catch the offender and anticipate how they may react to various investigative efforts.
What is the potential issue with relying on the intuiton profilers determine who the criminal is?
Profilers don't use science or theory when analysing who the potential offender is and at times use ambigious descriptions (Barnaum effect) that can be made to fit any offender
Profiling is chekced for accuracy by seeing at the end of the case whether the profile was actually similar to the offenders' actual acharacteristics. However who's research suggested that the way in which the top-down approach is checked for accuracy needs to be changed?