Save
Lecture 8
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
VoicelessFoal88943
Visit profile
Cards (28)
Coordination
compound
A central
metal
ion M, surrounded by a shell of ions/molecules known as
ligands
L
View source
M
Normally an
electron acceptor
/
Lewis acid
View source
L
Normally a
nucleophile
/
Lewis
base
View source
Types
of ligands
σ-donor ligand:
donates
electron density, often using s-orbitals or sp^n hybrids
σ-acceptor ligand:
accepts
electron density, using s-orbitals
π-donor ligand:
donates
electron density using p-orbitals
π-acceptor ligand:
accepts
electron density using p-orbitals
View source
σ-donor ligand
The most
common
View source
π
-donor and -acceptor ligands
Have both
σ
and
π
components
View source
We
won't cover σ-acceptor in this part of the course, because it is too complicated
View source
Hapticity
/'eta' (η)
The number of
neighbouring
atoms in a ligand which are
coordinated simultaneously
to a metal centre
View source
Denticity
/'kappa' (κ)
The number of
non-neighbouring
atoms in a ligand which are coordinated simultaneously to a
metal
centre
View source
Formation
constants (K$_f$)
Used to express
metal
complex
stability
View source
Complex ion equilibrium: aA + bB ⇌ cC
The
formation constant
is given by: K$_f$=[C]^c/([A]^a[B]^b)
View source
Formation constant
(
K
$_f$)
Allows calculations
of
thermodynamic values ΔG, ΔS and ΔH: ΔG^
0
=-RT ln{K}=ΔH^0-TΔS^0
View source
Stepwise formation
constants
Used to
given an
overall
formation
constant, β$_n$: β$_n$=K$_1$×K$_2$×K$_3$×...×K$_n$, log β$_n$=log K$_1$+log K$_2$+log K$_3$+...+log K$_n$
View source
Formation
constant (K$_f$)
High
values indicate
high
complex stability
Values typically
decrease
with each successive
substitution
If they don't, then it's likely a
change
in geometry occurred, particularly with small
metal
ions
View source
Factors
affecting metal complex stability (monodentate only)
Ionic size
and
charge
HSAB
View source
Ionic
size and charge
Stability usually decreases with increasing cation size, but this does not apply to the
transition
metals
View source
HSAB
Hard cations form more stable complexes with hard
ligands
, due to
ionic
bonding (entropy driven)
Soft cations form more stable complexes with
soft ligands
, due to covalent bonding (
enthalpy
driven)
Hard-soft
mismatches are not favoured as not enough energy is released to overcome the high solvation energy of the
hard
species
View source
Hard acids
Small and
highly-charged
= high charge density =
less
polarisable
View source
Soft acids
Less
electropositive metals
, with a lower
charge-to-radius
ratio = low charge density = more polarisable
View source
Hard bases
Small anions/neutral molecules =
high
charge density =
less
polarisable
View source
Soft bases
Larger
anions/neutral molecules =
low
charge density = more polarisable
View source
This explains why early first-row transition metals are isolated from
oxide
ores, but Pb and Hg occur mostly in
sulfide
ores
View source
The soft character increases particularly towards the
bottom left
of the d-block
View source
Most second and third-row
transition
metals occur in nature as suflide ores (
soft-soft
match)
View source
Denticity
(κ)
1 donor atom = monodentate/unidentate
2
donor atom = didientate/bidentate
3
donor atom = tridentate/terdentate
4
donor atom = tetradentate
5
donor atom = pentadentate
6
donor atom = hexadentate
View source
Chelate
A
ligand
bonded to the
central metal
atom at two or more points
View source
Chelate
effect
Confers
increased stability
on a
complex
Can be thought of through
probability
, sterics, and
entropy
View source
Chelation
Increases stability, which can be measured and compared with non-chelated analogues through
formation constants
(K$_f$) and
entropy
values (ΔS^0)
View source