Lecture 8

Cards (28)

  • Coordination compound

    A central metal ion M, surrounded by a shell of ions/molecules known as ligands L
  • M
    Normally an electron acceptor/Lewis acid
  • L
    Normally a nucleophile/Lewis base
  • Types of ligands

    • σ-donor ligand: donates electron density, often using s-orbitals or sp^n hybrids
    • σ-acceptor ligand: accepts electron density, using s-orbitals
    • π-donor ligand: donates electron density using p-orbitals
    • π-acceptor ligand: accepts electron density using p-orbitals
  • σ-donor ligand
    • The most common
  • π-donor and -acceptor ligands

    • Have both σ and π components
  • We won't cover σ-acceptor in this part of the course, because it is too complicated
  • Hapticity/'eta' (η)

    The number of neighbouring atoms in a ligand which are coordinated simultaneously to a metal centre
  • Denticity/'kappa' (κ)

    The number of non-neighbouring atoms in a ligand which are coordinated simultaneously to a metal centre
  • Formation constants (K$_f$)

    Used to express metal complex stability
  • Complex ion equilibrium: aA + bB ⇌ cC
    The formation constant is given by: K$_f$=[C]^c/([A]^a[B]^b)
  • Formation constant (K$_f$)

    Allows calculations of thermodynamic values ΔG, ΔS and ΔH: ΔG^0=-RT ln{K}=ΔH^0-TΔS^0
  • Stepwise formation constants
    Used to given an overall formation constant, β$_n$: β$_n$=K$_1$×K$_2$×K$_3$×...×K$_n$, log β$_n$=log K$_1$+log K$_2$+log K$_3$+...+log K$_n$
  • Formation constant (K$_f$)

    • High values indicate high complex stability
    • Values typically decrease with each successive substitution
    • If they don't, then it's likely a change in geometry occurred, particularly with small metal ions
  • Factors affecting metal complex stability (monodentate only)

    • Ionic size and charge
    • HSAB
  • Ionic size and charge

    Stability usually decreases with increasing cation size, but this does not apply to the transition metals
  • HSAB
    • Hard cations form more stable complexes with hard ligands, due to ionic bonding (entropy driven)
    • Soft cations form more stable complexes with soft ligands, due to covalent bonding (enthalpy driven)
    • Hard-soft mismatches are not favoured as not enough energy is released to overcome the high solvation energy of the hard species
  • Hard acids
    Small and highly-charged = high charge density = less polarisable
  • Soft acids
    Less electropositive metals, with a lower charge-to-radius ratio = low charge density = more polarisable
  • Hard bases
    Small anions/neutral molecules = high charge density = less polarisable
  • Soft bases
    Larger anions/neutral molecules = low charge density = more polarisable
  • This explains why early first-row transition metals are isolated from oxide ores, but Pb and Hg occur mostly in sulfide ores
  • The soft character increases particularly towards the bottom left of the d-block
  • Most second and third-row transition metals occur in nature as suflide ores (soft-soft match)
  • Denticity (κ)

    • 1 donor atom = monodentate/unidentate
    • 2 donor atom = didientate/bidentate
    • 3 donor atom = tridentate/terdentate
    • 4 donor atom = tetradentate
    • 5 donor atom = pentadentate
    • 6 donor atom = hexadentate
  • Chelate
    A ligand bonded to the central metal atom at two or more points
  • Chelate effect

    • Confers increased stability on a complex
    • Can be thought of through probability, sterics, and entropy
  • Chelation
    Increases stability, which can be measured and compared with non-chelated analogues through formation constants (K$_f$) and entropy values (ΔS^0)