Information that the researcher has collected firsthand for a specific purpose e.g. data from an experiment or observation
evaluation of primary data
more certainty on how valid it is, researcher themselves knows the strengths/ weaknesses of their own research.
likely to be scientifically gathered for the stated aim of the study. This means they are more credible.
New research and ideas can be discovered through primary data, as it may not have been explored before.
Expensive to obtain because each researcher or research team has to start from the beginning of a study and follow the whole study through
Time consuming,
Maybe biased due to the researcher wanting to find certain results.
secondary data
when the researcher uses information collected by others (often to answer other questions) e.g. the work of other psychologists or government statistics
evaluation of secondary data
Doesn’t take long to collect as the research has already been carried out.
Can gather lots of data in a short space of time.
Can help to build an idea about what most research is presenting in certain areas
Might not be relevant to what you are researching. This can lead to spending lots of time trawling through journals and research papers.
Data can be over complicated and may be more difficult to understand. This is because the research has been written by someone else.
Sometimes the data can be out of date (lacks temporal validity)