Sometimes assault & battery occur at the sametime, this offence is known as COMMON ASSAULT
Assault - Common Law
Intentionally or recklessly causing V to apprehend immediate unlawful force
There is no need for V to be frightened, 'apprehend' in this context means 'to be aware of'
R v Lamb (1967)
D & V were friends, V dared D to pull the trigger of a gun they had just found, both were laughing as neither of them believedthatthegunwouldfire
No assault in Lamb as D did not cause V to apprehend force (noactusreus)
Immediate
Means imminent, not instantaneous
Smith v Superintendent of Woking (1983)
D stood in an enclosed garden of a block of flats & looked through a bedsitting room window at V at 11 p.m.
Gestures can amount to assault, 'immediate' doesn't mean instantaneous – it means imminent
R v Ireland (1997)
D made repeated silent phone calls to 3 women who suffered psychiatric illness as a result
Silence can amount to assault
R v Constanza (1997)
D sent 2 threatening letters to V, over 800 other letters, made numerous silent phone calls, wrote offensive words on her front door, followed her & called at her house. V suffered clinical depression.
Words (spoken & written) can amount to assault, 'immediate' means 'any time, not excluding the immediate future'
Force
A touchwill be sufficient
Gestures, words (spoken or written) and silence can cause an assault, they can also cancel an assault
Tuberville v Savage (1669)
'If it were not assize time, I would not take such language from you!'
There is no assault if it obvious to the victim that Dcannotorwillnotcarryout his threat of violence
R v Light (1857)
D held a sword above his wife's head & said "Were it not for the bloody policeman outside, I would split your head open"
The D's words in R v Light didnot negate, or cancel the assault as the threat was so harsh
Battery - Common Law
Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful physical force
Collins v Wilcock (1984)
WPC Wilcock took hold of Collins's arm to talk to/restrain her as she walked away, this was a battery as W was not trying to arrest Collins (so was unlawful)
The 'slightest touch' is 'force' & is a battery, but the 'jostlingsofeverydaylife' are not because they have been impliedly consented to
R v Thomas (1985)
A man rubbed the hem of a skirt whilst being worn by a schoolgirl, touching clothes is the same as touching a person and can be a battery
Rv Martin (1881)
A man placed an iron bar across the exit doors in a theatre, turned off the lights & shouted 'fire', many people were hurt in the panic, this was a battery inflicted indirectly
Battery can be indirect & can be inflicted by omission
Haystead v CC Derbyshire (2000)
Battery on the child when D punched a woman who then dropped the child
DPP v SantaBermudez (2003)
Battery on the PC when D omitted to tell her he had a needle in his pocket during a search, there is a duty to put right the dangerous situation D has created
Anyhurtorinjurycalculatedtointerferewiththehealthorcomfortof the individual
R v Miller (1954)
D threw his wife to the ground 3 times
Actus Reus of ABH
A non-trivial injury to any part of the body, including the organs, nervoussystem and brain (but NOT emotions such as fear, distress or panic)
R v Chan-Fook (1994)
Suspecting V of theft a shopkeeper (V) locked V in a room, V became hysterical
R v Constanza (1997)
Clinical depression amounted to the actus reus of ABH
DPP v Smith (2006)
Cutting hair amounted to the actus reus of ABH
T v DPP (2003)
V was kicked by D & momentarily lost consciousness, this amounted to the actus reus of ABH
'Occasioning' means 'causing', this can be direct or indirect
DPP v K (a minor) (2006)
The actus reus of ABH can be indirect
Types of injury regarded as ABH under Joint Charging Standards
Broken nose
Minor fractures
Extensive or multiple bruising
Loss or breaking of tooth
Temporary loss of consciousness
Psychiatric injury (more than fear, distress or panic)
Cutting hair
Mens rea of ABH
D only needs to intend or see a risk of causing V to apprehend unlawful force OR to intend or see a risk of applying force
R v Savage (1991)
D threw beer over another woman in a pub, the glass slipped from D's hand & V's hand was cut by the glass, D saw no risk at all of V being hurt - she only intended for her to be wet from the beer, conviction upheld
Meaning of 'wound'
A break in the continuity of the skin (a break on the top layer of the skin is a graze not a wound)