PART ONE, CHAPTER THIRTEEN
Here we are presented with a description of the investigation into the rape of Lola. It is compressed into a short, vital passage of reflection. Briony's doubts about what she saw are acknowledged, and we see the process by which these doubts were quashed or ignored at the time.
The image of the 'glazed surface' of Briony's conviction with 'hairline cracks' (p. 168) recalls the Meissen vase, mended do that the cracks are barely visible. Both the vase and Briony's story will come apart again later. It recalls, too, the flaw in the bowl in Henry James's novel 'The Golden Bowl'.
Also, the use of 'glazed surface' suggests that the truth is hidden and will be eventually revealed. Briony hinting at her revelation of truth in the final part of the novel.
In acknowledging that she did not really see Robbie, but 'knew' (p. 169) it was him, Briony falls short of admitting that she lied. As a child, she believed in her strange means of perception. Indeed, her mother has been shown to have similar faith in intuitive knowledge. Sitting silently in the house, Emily feels and senses what is going on around her, and 'what she knew, she knew' (p. 66). Briony sees what she expects to see: 'The truth instructed her eyes' (p. 169). This is a motif repeated throughout the novel, but it never has such dire consequences as here.
Briony interprets events so that they fulfil a pattern she has seen and wants to complete. She believes that symmetry and common sense confirm what she knows and that this in itself is evidence. We have already seen that she hates disorder. She will not write about divorce because it is messy. She will not violate symmetry in her own stories and does not like to think it can be violated in real life. She has already wondered how to use the scene at the fountain in her writing. Now she is going beyond using the experience to form stories and is using a story to recast experience.
The passage is presented as though it is a mirror on Briony's reflections at the time, though clearly it has been refracted through years of guilt and analysis of what she did. The writing makes excuses for her as she might have done herself: 'What she meant was rather more complex';'There were no opportunities, no time' (p. 169). There is a childish image of scary things emerging from the quiet village, something frightening and powerful that had been waiting for this catastrophe. She is overly defensive, voicing a childish desire to avoid blame, but there is also a more adult point to this, examining psychological motives. Briony as a child was eager to please, afraid of upsetting people, scared to change her version of events because she was nervous about disapproval or getting into trouble. This is convincing and prepares the way for the courage she shows later in deciding to retract her statement. The recriminations will be fare greater if she changes it in the future. She feels foolish if she deviates from her story as older, more experienced people show displeasure; it is 'wise' (p. 169) brows frown. This extended explanation generates some sympathy for Briony. It is easy to understand a person, especially a child, being afraid to disappoint people and to get herself in trouble.
The final image, of the 'bride-to-be' (p. 169) who has doubts before a wedding, prefigures Lola's wedding to Pual in Part Three. Did Lola have doubts? At the same time, it recalls the marriage-centered plot of The Trials of Arabella and the unsatisfactory marriages of the novel so far. Instead, the appealing, foolish nervousness, the comparison might be expected to conjure up, any reflection on marriage as it is presented in 'Atonement' would suggest that doubts are highly appropriate.
The passage concentrates solely on Briony's actions and reactions. Her excitement, her desire to find or impose a satisfying pattern on events, and her fear of alienating people by expressing her doubts are all given as reasons for her to remain loyal to this story of Robbie assaulting Lola. The great absence in all of this is Lola. Everything put in motion by Briony could have been stopped by Lola, and why it does not remains a mystery, It could be argued that Lola's silence is by far the worse crime. 'Lola was required only to remain silent about the truth' (p. 168). The fact that Lola's motivations are not discussed comes down to a question of ownership: 'It was [Briony's] story, the one that was writing itself around her' (p. 166)
However, Lola herself says that 'She couldn't see, his hand was over her eyes...she couldn't say for sure' (p. 168). Therefore, Lola didn't necessarily conceal the truth, she may have genuinely not known who assaulted her.
'to seal the crime' (p. 165)--> Briony doesn't want anything to be out of place. The desire for patterns and perfection.