6. Learning Theory - An Explanation of Attachment

Cards (10)

  • 0. REMINDER!!!
    THIS IS CLASSICAL + OPERANT CONDITIONING - NOT BOWLBY!!!!!!!!!
    1. Learning Theory
    Dollard + Miller (1950):
    • ‘Cupboard love’.
    • Importance of caregiver as food provider.
  • 1a. Learning Theory
    Dollard + Miller (1950) - Classical Conditioning:
    • Food (UCS) = Pleasure (UCR).
    • Mother (NS) = No Response.
    • Food (UCS) + Mother (NS) = Pleasure (UCR).
    • Mother (CS) = Pleasure (CR).
  • 1b. Learning Theory

    Dollard + Miller (1950) - Classical Conditioning
    • Food (UCS) causes pleasure (UCR).
    • When caregiver (NS) provides food = association.
    • Caregiver (now CS) produces pleasure (now CR) bc infant associated them w/ pleasure + expects food.
  • 2. Learning Theory
    Sears et al. (1957) - Operant Conditioning:
    • Caregiver provides food = primary drive of hunger generalised.
    • Attachment = secondary drive learned through association.
    • Crying — Caregiver Response = Feeding.
  • 2. Learning Theory
    Sears et al. (1957) - Operant Conditioning:
    • Behaviour (crying) reinforced through positive reinforcement.
    • Directs crying for comfort.
    • Comfort response = facilitates attachment.
    • 2-way process as while baby reinforced for crying, caregiver negative reinforcement bc crying stops.
    • Reinforcement strengthens attachment.
  • Learning Theory (Evaluation)
    Limitation:
    P - lack animal study support.
    E - Lorenz’s (1952) geese imprinted on 1st moving object, regardless of food.
    E - Harlow’s (1958) monkeys attachment behaviour towards soft ‘mother’ over wired one (contact comfort).
    L - factors other than association w/ food important.
  • Learning Theory (Evaluation)
    Limitation:
    P - lack infant study support.
    E - Schaffer + Emerson (1964); infants form main att. to mother regardless whether they fed them or not.
    E - Isabella et al. (1989); high interactional synchrony = quality attachment (no food involved).
    L - food not main factor in human attachment.
  • Learning Theory (Evaluation)
    Strength:
    P - conditioning involved in aspects of attachment.
    E - e.g. baby associates feeling warm w/ presence of specific adult; influences choose of main att. fig.
    L - learning theory useful in understanding development of attachment.
  • Learning Theory (Evaluation)
    Limitation:
    P - classical + operant conditioning, infant in passive role.
    E - active role in interactions (Feldman + Eidelman, 2007).
    L - conditioning not adequate explanation.