Milne and Bull (2002) suggested, where context reinstatement and report everything produced the greatest accuracy of recall of correct information as compared to any other combinations of steps.
even if police force dont have enough time to train for whole thing, gradual changes from standard police interview can increase accuracy and reliability of EWT
limitation- increase recall of inaccurate info
The CI does not only increase the recall of correct information by 81%, but also increases the recall of incorrect information by 61%, as suggested by Kohnken et al
This appears counterintuitive when considering that the chief aim of the CI was to improve the accuracy of recall of correct information and so decreases validity of eyewitness testimonies overall- false convictions, highly unethical or no convictions
limitation- little practical value
due to being too time-consuming and requiring specialist skills. For example, researchers argued that only a few hours of training, as is possible for many police forces, is insufficient to adequately train interviewers, especially for the enhanced social understanding required for the enhanced cognitive interview.
Therefore, this lack of time for training may explain why some forces may be unimpressed with the CI.