Primarily interested in power and balance of power
Liberals
Interested in explaining the conditions under which international cooperation, collaboration, or multilateralism becomes possible
Liberalists
Take into consideration "second" and "first image" factors being critical to explaining international outcomes
Take into account international and nongovernmental organizations and often cross-cutting networks that connect them
Liberalism has 5 key assumptions
1st assumption: states AND nonstate transnational actors are important in world politics
2nd assumption: many liberals see economic or other forms of interdependence or interconnectedness among state and nonstate actors a pacifying effect or moderation one on state behavior
3rd assumption: have an extensive agenda of IR
4th assumption "inside-out" view : examines factors of state-society and individual levels of analysis affect international relations and outcomes
5th assumption: the main point is to discover under what conditions international collaboration, if not peace, might be achieved
Neoliberal institutionalists
Utilize the rational-actor assumption to help generate testable hypotheses on how international organizations can affect states' calculations of interests
Regime theory
Argues that collaboration is possible where principles, norms and actor's expectations converge on a particular issue area
Liberalism
Sees game theory with a positive perspective - absolute gains (all win)
Examines the upgrading common interest to include the impact of nonmaterial factors such as ideas and norms
Human agents matter -conduct is influenced by ideas or constrains
Contributors of liberalism
Montesquieu
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Immanuel Kant
Adam smith
Richard Cobden
Agency
A focus on actors
Human agents at the individual and small-group levels of analysis matter in liberal understanding
Interest group liberalism
International political processes are not all that different from and may even be considered an extension of, those conducted within the boundaries of a given state
3 liberal notions
the state as neutral arbiter
the potential for a natural harmony of interest in this case among groups of individuals
public concern for and participation in, policy processes not restricted to elites
Natural Harmony of group competition
Interest group liberalism defines competing leaders and public interest
Political interest groups to liberals are those in which multiple actors compete
Liberal philosophers and interest groups liberals both agree on the nature of the state and society and the potential for harmony to develop within representative democracies out of competition and conflict
Primary purpose of state
To regulate conflict, demands and for expression of interests
Functionalism
Conflicts must be resolved by experts instead of politicians
Collaboration of certain issues may lead to further collaboration promoting unity and avoidance of conflict as they would have greater loss
Neofunctionalism
Emphasizes integral politics
Argued that for integration to occur it must be of benefit for the leader and state to further pursue said integration
Takes into consideration best interest of actors when doing actions
James Rosenau's work
Focused on the roles played by both state and non state actors
Created a differentiation between micro(individual) and macro (system structure) issues and relational one that tries to put the micro and macro together
International regimes
Rules agreed to by states in specific issues areas and often associated with international and nongovernmental organizations linked to these regimes
Power-based realist theories
Emphasize the role of anarchy and impact of distribution of capabilities
Hegemonic stability: argues that regimes are established and maintained when a state holds a preponderance of power resources
If power is spread equally among states and regimes do not adapt themselves it leads to their decline
Knowledge-based cognitive regime theories
Argue that state interests are not given, but rather created
They examine the role of normative and causative beliefs of decision makers in explaining preferences and interest information
Epistemic Communities: networks of professionals with recognized expertise and competence in a particular domain and an authoritative claim to policy-relevant knowledge within that domain
International institutions has 3 form
Formal Intergovernmental or Cross-National, Nongovernmental Organizations
International Regimes
Conventions
States use international institutions
To enhance cooperations for self interested reasons
Guarantors of commitments made by the state
Reputation
Reciprocity (including threats of retaliation)
Keohane
Claims that institutions and regimes matter because they enable states to do things they otherwise could not do
States will most likely rely on regimes for self interest
Realists vs Neoliberals on regimes
Realists see regimes as constraints on state behavior while neoliberals view regimes positively as actually enabling states to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes
Greater institutionalization as the world becomes more likely with a polity with governance essential to trade, finance, environment, security and other matters of global import
Absolute gains for all
Are possible as policy makers learn the benefits of cooperation in areas of interest to them
Global governance
Involves the processes and institutions both formal and informal that guide and restrain the collective activities of groups
Brooks examines three major means by which the international economy can influence security
Changing capabilities
Incentives
Nature of the actors
For liberals the likelihood of war is decreased by
Expansion of free trade and democracy
Kant's republicanism
Representative democracy supported by the rule of law and respect for basic freedoms of rights in civil society
Centrality of state-society relations
State is composed of diverse societal actors
Ideas, groups interests, institutions and individuals shape state preferences
Agency is important- state as actors has meaning only when we look within the state to the decision makers themselves and examine how they are influenced by domestic factors and how they relate to their decision-making counterparts in other states
liberalism is founded on the belief that the well being of an individual should be the basis of a just society
Realist perspective
Anarchy causes for the development to further government
Anarchy determines the behavior of states
Realist perspective
Examines relations amongst states different than actors (overall def for intl relations)
Anarchy
No central authority
States
Always prioritize security
Always seek to have greater power than the rest of the states
Increasing of power
May lead to distrust from other states
Liberalism
A positive view of human nature
Individuals are self-interested, but they also share many interests
War is not inevitable
People can achieve mutually beneficial cooperation not only within states but also across international boundaries
Cooperation based on mutual interest can prevail in the long run