Discovered that of 200,000 wounded men admitted to CCS on the Western Front high explosive shells and shrapnel were responsible for 58% of wounds
Shells could kill or injure a soldier immediately
Machineguns could fire 450 rounds a minute. Their bullets could fracture bones or pierce organs.
wound infection
When men were injured by shrapnel or bullets the metal would penetrate their body, taking the fabric of the uniform with it.
Was no cure for gas gangrene.
The bacteria for gas gangrene spread through the body quickly and could kill a person within a day.
head injuries
Brodie Helmet was trialled in 1915 to protect against head injuries
Is estimated that it reduced fatal head wounds by 80%.
The helmet was then provided to all soldiers fighting on the Western Front.
gas attacks
Only 6,000 British soldiers died as a result of gas attacks.
Chlorine- First used by the Germans in 1915 at the Second Battle of Ypres, Led to death by suffocation.
Phosgene- First used at the end of 1915 near Ypres. Similar effects to Chlorine but was faster acting, killing an exposed person in 2 days
Mustard- First used in 1917 by the Germans. Was an odourless gas that worked within 12 hours. Caused internal and external blisters and could pass through clothing to burn the skin
horses
August 1914- the BEF decided not to send any motor ambulances to France.
Instead used horse-drawn ambulance wagons.
horses- positives
Could access areas motor ambulances could not
horses- negatives
Men were shaken about, which made their injuries worse
Lack of transport led to soldiers being left to die or being taken prisoner
trains
November 1914- the first ambulance train designed for carrying wounded soldiers arrived in France.
trains- positives
Some trains contained operatingtheatres
Space for stretches on both sides of the carriage
trains- negatives
Concern that moving injured on the railways damaged the wareffort as there were too many trains moving around on the rail network
canal burges
Concerns about the disruption to the rail network led to the decision to make use of canal barges to transport the wounded to Base hospitals.
canal burges- positives
Comfortable journey for soldiers
Could be transferred directly onto ships transporting men back to Britain
canal burges- negatives
Journey was slow
stretcher bearers
4-8 men would recover the dead and wounded during breaks from fighting. Carried basic medicalsupplies. There were 16 per battalion of 1,000.
2. regimental aid post
Close to the front and would move forward when casualties were expected
Would bandage light wounds with dressings and men would go back into action.
3. field ambulance and dressing station
Mobile unit with medical officers, support staff and nurses
In tents or derelict buildings
Would receive wounded from RAP and triage them.
4. casualty clearing station
Would be in large tents or schools and factories.
Had 12 doctors with nurses.
From 1917 started performing more operations than hospitals
Had beds for 50 and could deal with 1,000 casualties at a time, but usually had more.
5. Base hospitals
Civilian hospitals or large converted buildings near railways so patients could be moved quickly.
In 1918 had 2,500 patients.
Had operating theatres, labs and x-ray departments. Some had specialist centres i.e. Rouen for victims of gas attacks.
Most sent back to England from here, but some did go to recovery wards and returned to fight.
new techniques- wounds
Cutting away of dead, damaged and infected tissue from around the site of the wound. Needed to be done as soon as possible because infection
amputations- By 1918 – 240,000 men had lost limbs because it was the only way to prevent the spread of infection and death
the Carrel-Dakin method involved using a sterilised salt solution in the wound through a tube.
new techniques- thomas splint
In 1914-15, men with a gunshot of shrapnel wound to the leg only have 20% chance of survival because the wounds created a compound fracture
Robert Jones and Hugh Thomas designed a splint to stop joints from moving – the Thomas Splint.
This increased the survival rate for this type of wound from 20% to 82%.
new techniques- mobile x ray units
X-rays were used to identify shell fragments and bullets in wounds which could otherwise cause infection.
Problems- Tubes used in the machines were fragile and overheated quite quickly meaning that the machine could only be used for about one hour at a time
Base Hospitals and large CCS had static x-ray machines.
new techniques- blood
Use of blood transfusions from 1915 in the British sector of the Western Front was pioneered by Robertson.
He used the indirect method, where a syringe and tube was used to transfer the donor to the patient.
Purpose of this was to stop the patient going into shock through blood loss before surgery.
1916, Rous and Turner found that adding citrate glucose could store it for up to 4 weeks.
head injuries
About 20% of all wounds in the British sector of the Western Front were to the head, face and neck, as this was the most exposed.
Injuries could be caused by both bullets and shrapnel
plastic surgery
Harold Gillies developed work into plastic surgery.
This was important as head injuries that might not kill, could cause severe disfigurement.
August 1917 – key hospital providing this surgery was Queen’s Hospital in Kent.
By the end of the war, nearly 12,000 operations had been carried out.
plastic surgery- positives
Were able to replace and restore parts of the face that had been destroyed.
Just after a year after Queen’s Hospital opened, nearly 12,000 operations had been carried out.
plastic surgery- negatives
Gillies had no background in this type of surgery so had to devise new operations to deal with problems as they confronted him
brain surgery
Injuries to the brain were likely to prove fatal at the beginning of the war due to: The issue of infection, Difficulties in moving men, Very few doctors had experience of neurosurgery before the war
Harvey Cushing developed new techniques in brain surgery
Cushing operated on 45 patients in 1917 with an operation survival rate of 71%.
brain surgery- positives
Cushing operated with a 71% survival rate.
Improved understanding in head injuries and surgery.
brain surgery- negatives
Inexperience of doctors in dealing with head wounds.