Cards (46)

    • Redistribution of industry after the war provided a broad base for industrial recovery since expanded eastern european countries permitted (permitted?) exploitation of new sources of raw materials and energy.
    • To help rebuild industry, 2 more 5 year plans were introduced.
    Industry after the war
  • Aims: to catch up with the US, rebuild heavy industry and transport, to revive the Ukraine (a third of all expenditure was allocated here)
    Detail: use of extensive reparations from East Germany, maintainence of wartime controls of labour force- long hours, low wages, high targets, female labour and Grand Projects such as canals and HEP plants.
    Results: USSR became 2nd to the USA in industrial capacity, most targets in heavy industry met, production doubled and urban and urban workforce increased from 67 to 77 million. By 1947, Dniper Dam up and working again. 

    Fourth five year plan 1946-50
    • Aims: continuation of development of heavy industry and transport post 1953, under Malenkov, consumer gods, housing ad services received stronger investment
    • Detail: continuation of 4th plan but resources diverted to rearmament during the Korean War (1950-53). After Stalin's death, Malenkov reduced expenditure of military and heavy industry.
    • Results: most growth targets met National income increased 71%, Malenkovs changes met opposition resulting in his loss of leadership in 1955. 

    5th 5 year plan 1951-55
    • economic issues were one of the most debated areas during the leadership struggle after 1953.
    • Khrushchev opposed Malenkov's proposal to move the economic focus away from heavy to light industry. Malenkov criticised K's agricultural policies so K adopted them to be more similar to his
    Industrial development under Khrushchev
    • Ministers of Moscow set different industrial targets for each enterprise which knew very little about the situation.
    • Too little administrators so system didn't work properly
    • Enterprises were judged and given bonuses according to their success in output targets. However, if they exceeded targets this would be the new target for the following year so managers 'played it safe'.
    • Output targets were weighted by weight to heavier were favoured rather than lighter regardless of if that's what consumers wanted. 

    Issues with Stalinist system of decentralisation and industrial planning
    • They were not his ideas but but he delivered them with new energy which helped to break some constraints.
    • He introduced the 6th 5 yr plan but it was too optimistic and was abandoned after 2 years.
    • Decentralisation: 60 Moscow Ministers were abolished and 105 economic regions, each in its own local economic council (sovnarkhoz) to plan and supervise the economy. Extended K's patronage network into localities. 

    Khrushchev and industry
    • Emphasis on improving standards of living for ordinary people, with a 40-hour week and 40% wage rise promised by 1965. The targets it laid down were merged into the 7th 5 yr plan (1961-65).
    • Both had the slogan of 'Catch up and overtake the USA by 1970' and there was shift to modern industries. 

    7 year plan 1959
    • Vast expansion of chemicals industry - especially in fields of plastics, fertilisers and artificial fibres
    • Housing factories to produce prefabricated sections for new flats
    • increased production of consumer goods
    • greater exploitation of USSR's resources - natural gas, oil and coal - and building of power stations.
    Modern industries
    • Many railway lines were electrified and the Aeroflot corporation was subsided to offer cheap long-distance passenger travel
    • In 1957, the USSR launched the Erath's first artificial satellite (Sputnik) and pictures of the dark side of the moon were taken

    Expansion in Soviet communications
    • Coal: 391 million tons in 1955 compared to 578 in 1965
    • Electricity: 170 billion kWh in 1955 and 507 in 1965
    • TV sets: 495 thousands by 1955 and 1675 in 1965.
    Results of industrial change:
    • His decentralisation measures actually created another layer of bureaucracy and his system was abandoned in 1965, shortly after his fall from power.
    • Standards of living improved but quality of life was still poor.
    • Heavy spending on armaments and space race distorted the economy and it didn't overtake the US. From 1958, economic growth slowed down significantly to 7.5% in 1964 from 10% previously in the 50s.
    • Consumer growth: only 2% by 1964
    How far did Khrushchev achieve his aims?
    • Scorched earth policy destroyed western regions and only a third were left operational
    • 1945 harvest produced less than 60% of pre-war and 1946 saw rost draught since 1891
    Agriculture under Stalin
    • Aims: force kolkhozes to deliver agricultural products, revive that wheat fields of the Ukraine (although most investment went to industry here) and transform nature and revitalise barren land
    • Details: massive state direction: high quotas for grain and livestock/low peasant wages, higher taxes on produce from private owned land and returned to kolkhozes. Followed ideas of Lysenko.
    • Results: State procured 70% of harvest leaving peasants with little, output to kolkhozes increased by not to 30s level, lagged behind industry
    Agricultural 4th 5 yr plan
  • Aim: continuation of 4th 5 yr plan aims plus Khrushchev's initiative to develop 'Virgin lands' and build agrocities from 1953
    Details: high procurement levels maintained, expansion of agriculture in formerly uncultivated areas
    Results: agricultural production still behind industry and not yet to level of 1940
    5th 5 yr plan for agriculture
  • Khrushchev prided himself on his agricultural expertise. Coming from a peasant background himself, he enjoyed spending time in the countryside, talking with the peasants in an earthy' language which at least suggested (and probably meant) he was interested in farming matters.

    K and the economy
    • As early as 1953 Khrushchev told the Central Committee that the limitations of agricultural production under Stalin had been concealed by unreliable statistics and that, in practice, grain output and the number of livestock being reared had been less than in the last years of tsarist Russia.
    Stalin's encouragement of particular farming methods was also criticised as counter-productive, although Khrushchev continued to favour some whose ideas were scientifically dubious, such as Lysenko.

    K and agriculture
  • Khrushchev therefore increased investment and put forward a number of proposals for change. As with industry, he placed the implementation of reforms in the hands of the local Party organisations. The Ministry of Agricultures powers were thus reduced so that it became little more than a consultative and advisory Body. 

    What did K do the agriculture
    • the price paid for state procurements of grain and other agricultural goods was raised (grain prices rose 25 per cent between 1953 and 1956)
    • state procurement quotas were reduced
    • taxes were reduced (and made payable on plot size rather than what the peasant owned, for example, livestock)
    • quotas on peasants' private plots were cut
    • peasants who did not possess animals were no longer to be required to deliver meat to the State collectives were allowed to set their own production targets and choose how to use their land.
    Incentives to farmers
    • increase in the numbers of farms which were connected to the electricity grid (previously most were without electricity)
    • increases in the use of farm machinery, which the collectives were able to buy from the Machine Tractor Stations (then disbanded in 1958 - which suited the peasants who had formerly had to pay for the loan of equipment in goods - and turned into repair stations)
    • encouragement to merge collectives to create larger farms.
    Increase production
  • The result was that the number of collectives was halved 1950-60 and the number of state farms' (generally double the size of the collectives) was increased. 

    Result of putting collectives together
    • To cultivate grazing lands in western Siberia and northern Kazakhstan that had not previously been put under the plough.
    • When the first scheme in 1953 proved successful, the cultivated area was extended and a huge campaign was launched to attract farmers to settle in these parts.
    • Members of the Soviet youth movement, the Komsomol, were also encouraged to spend time on the new farms, helping to build settlements, put up fences, dig ditches and build roads.
    virgin land scheme
    • By 1956, 35.9 million hectares of virgin land' had been ploughed for wheat; the equivalent of the total cultivated area of Canada.

    Result of virgin land scheme
    • The new measures failed to encourage the peasants to put more effort into their work on the collectives and state farms.
    • Although there was some attempt to increase the amount of time the peasants spent on communal farming (as opposed to their own private plots), the latter continued to provide about half the peasants' income and to contribute over 30 per cent of the produce sold in the USSR.
    • This was despite the fact that private plots represented only around 3 per cent of the total cultivated area.

    failure of vls
    • Furthermore, the new pricing system proved a failure because officials kept altering the prices, so farmers found it difficult to plan ahead.
    • Frustrations at the low prices the State paid for products and the interference of Party officials in farm management brought plenty of grumbling, and sometimes had the effect of reducing peasant output.
    vls scheme failure 2
    • Khrushchev's grand schemes' also had their problems. The Virgin Lands Scheme was much less successful in the longer term than it seemed at first.
    • Climatic conditions had not been taken into account, and the land was worked so intensively, and without any rotation of wheat with other crops, that land erosion took place and the soil rapidly became infertile.
    • A particularly bad harvest in 1963 did not help matters but, embarrassingly for Khrushchev, the USSR was forced to import grain as a result - some from North America.
    Vls failure
    • Similarly the over-enthusiasm of local officials to meet with favour by growing maize, growing legumes, or ploughing up grassland was not always agriculturally sound.
    • There was only a limited rise in milk production when cows were transferred to the collectives while crops, such as maize, were often grown in unsuitable soil and sometimes to the detriment of much-needed wheat. In any case, Khrushchey's cornflakes did not go down well with a population more used to buckwheat porridge.
    food
    • Khrushchev was the first USSR leader to show such an interest in agriculture and he also made a huge effort to integrate rural areas into the Party structure, increasing rural representation within the Party at both the local and a more senior level.
    • The Soviet-controlled press devoted many pages to exalting the new initiatives and commenting on the carefully massaged statistics.
    • However, despite all the effort, results were really very mixed.
    Khrushchev's USSR was, in reality, a time of too many different initiatives, carried out with insufficient thought.
    agriculture analysed
    • Peasants were squeezed by the quota system and lived on an income that was less than 20 per cent of an industrial worker.
    • In the towns, services and consumer goods were all in short supply.
    • The working week remained at its wartime levels with a norm of 12 hours per day.
    • Wage differentials meant higher rations for Party officials.
    • In a continuation of the Stakhanovite programme, workers could be relocated to wherever they were needed.
    • Women were expected to make up for the war dead (and in the building trade represented a third of all workers).

    livin standards
    • Whatever his motivation, Khrushchev committed himself to improving the living standards of the Soviet people. Through his de-Stalinisation campaigns and economic reforms, he certainly accomplished something of this aim.
    • Consumer goods such as radios, televisions, sewing machines and refrigerators became more widely available, for example, and small quantities of imported foreign goods also began to enter the shops, although they always sold out very quickly.
    • There were some ambitious new housing initiatives too.

    society
  • In 1958, compulsory voluntary subscriptions to the State were abolished, and both the bachelors' tax and that on childless couples were removed. Pension arrangements were improved and even peasants became eligible for a state pension.
    Taxes
    • Hours of work were reduced with the introduction of the 40-hour working week, and a wage equalisation campaign saw an increase in the wages of the lowest paid.
    • This helped along the path towards greater social equality and the wage differentials between the highest and lowest paid in the USSR were indeed lower than those in any other highly industrialised country.
    • Factory trade unions were also given more responsibilities and this enabled them to take a more active role in employment negotiations.
    Working hours
    • However, privileges still remained in the form of non-wage payments, access to scarce commodities, health care and holidays for those at the higher level of the political hierarchy.
    • These undermined any claim that Khrushcher's USSR was an equal society.
    • Although cars became more common in the early 1960s, for example, they were generally beyond the reach of ordinary citizens and reserved for Party officials.
    class divides
  • The post-war years had seen the grim 'Zhdanovshchina during which censorship had grown tighter, the ethnic minorities had suffered, and freedom of cultural expression was non-existent. Despite the adulation he received, Stalin's paranoia had cast a grim shadow over social life breeding an atmosphere of fear and secrecy.
    Culture under Stalin after the war
    • De-Stalinisation was accompanied by a thaw, which brought a greater personal freedom for Soviet citizens.
    • Restrictions on the reading of foreign literature, on listening to foreign radio broadcasts and, to some extent, on what could be written or said, were lifted.
    • A limited number of citizens were allowed to travel abroad. Cultural and sports tours were arranged and televisions showed international performances by companies such as the Bolshoi and Kirov Ballet and the Moscow state circus, as well as by sports teams such as the Moscow Dynamos football team.

    culture change under K
  • Khrushchev also realised the economic potential of international tourism, and established 'Intourist' through which foreigners could visit the USSR and witness Soviet achievements at first hand. For ordinary citizens, and particularly for young people, seeing Westerners at close range was a transformative experience which opened new horizons.

    Tourism
  • this comes from a novel of the same name (Ottepel in Russian) by llya Ehrenburg, published in 1954; it tells of a woman who finds the courage to leave her husband - a tyrannical factory manager and 'little Stalin'
    The thaw
  • Greater contact with Western culture - either directly (for example at the World Festival of Youth, staged in Moscow in 1957, and attended by 34,000 people from 131 different countries) - or through radio and television broadcasts brought a new source of discontent with the rigidity of Soviet life.
    Young people saw the dress, music and behaviour of Westerners as exciting and 'modern? Jeans, rock and roll, jazz, make-up, greased hair, slang and teddy boys.
    Changesss
  • Changes in youth attitudes brought more incidents of petty vandalism and hooliganism, while in the universities there were incidents of students boycotting lectures or the communist dining rooms in protest against controls. According to a survey carried out by Soviet authorities in 1961, the majority of young people were cynical about the ideals of the October Revolution and were more motivated by material ambitions. Since 55 per cent of the population was under 30 years of age, this was a serious threat to the system.

    Youth
    • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn is another. He was released from labour camp and allowed to publish One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich in 1962, in which he described conditions in the gulag. Both books, which were highly critical of Stalinist times, achieved impressive sales; the latter sold a million copies in six months.

    literature
    • However, artists and writers did not enjoy complete freedom. Khrushchev's own tastes were conservative.
    • He disliked 'modernism' in literature and art and was quite outspoken and critical after a visit to a Moscow art gallery displaying modernist works in 1962. Nevertheless, 'culture was not judged solely by his personal taste. Artistic endeavour was, as it always had been, measured by its commitment to 'social responsibility.

    Was there complete freedom