A person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of an offence
Mens rea of attempts
With intent to commit that offence
An attempt is where a person tries to commit an offence but for some reason fails to complete it
Attempt (defined in s1. of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981)
If, with intent to commit an offence to which this section applies, a person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence
Common law tests for attempt before the 1981 Act
The last act test
The proximity test
The courts have now held these common law tests to be irrelevant, the important point is whether the defendant has done an act which is 'more than, merely preparatory'
Cases on 'merely preparatory'
Attorney-General's reference (No 1 of 1992) (1993)
Guellefer (1987)
R v Geddes (1996)
Campbell (1990)
Boyle and Boyle (1987)
Tosti (1987)
Jones (1990)
Intention required for attempt
Normally the defendant must have the same intention as would be required for the full offence
Cases on intention for attempt
Easom (1971)
Husseyn (1977)
Attorney-General's Reference (Nos 1and 2 of 1979)
Whybrow (1951)
Millard and Vernon (1987)
Attorney-General's reference (No 3 of 1992) (1994)
Impossibility under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981
A person may be guilty of attempting to commit an offence even though the facts are such that the commission of the offence is impossible
The House of Lords decision on impossibility in Anderton v Ryan (1985) was overruled a year later in R v Shivpuri (1986)
The dividing line between what is merely preparatory and what is an attempt is not always clear
Attempt cannot be committed by an omission due to the wording in the Criminal Attempts Act 1981
The Law Commission's 2009 report 'Conspiracy and Attempts' examined ways the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 improved on the common law and whether further reform is now required