8 rhesus monkeys - 4 with milk on wire mother - 4 with milk on cloth mother - observing time spent with each mother as result of milk placement
Harlow findings
all 8 monkeys spent most time with cloth mother - went to her when scared or exploring - infants form attachments with the person that offers contact comfort not food
long lasting effects proposed by Harlow
monkeys were socially abnormal + sexually abnormal, they recovered if reintroduced to other monkeys within 3 months of age, after 6 months changes were irreversible
lorenz eval research support
study found that chicks ,given a rubber glove for feeding them during first few weeks of life, imprinted on the glove and later tried to mate with it
Lorenz eval criticisms of imprinting
it became criticised that imprinting was irreversible, rubber glove study showed that after being reintroduced to chickens the chicks engaged in normal sexual behaviour over time, like any learning it is a plastic and forgiving mechanism
Harlow eval confounding variable
Mothers heads were different which could have impacted the attractiveness of the mothers, damaging the internal validity and varied the independent variable
Harlow eval generalising animal studies to humans
Human actions are governed by conscious choice.
studies have shown that infants are not most attracted to who feeds them.
Animal studies may indicate Human behaviour but it is not always certain and human studies should be conducted
Harlow eval ethics
animal study was cruel as it created lasting emotional damage
But it lead to big impacts in human childcare and primate care
Behaviourists explanation for behaviour
All behaviour is learnt through classical or operant conditioning
classical conditioning
learning through association
ucs + ucr
ns + ucs = ucr
cs = cr
operant conditioning
learning through reinforcement
social learning theory
learning through modelling attachment behaviours and being rewarded for appropriate attachment behaviours
learning theory is based on research with animals
may not be valid, but is process shares stimulus / response building blocks for humans and animals so it should be able to be generalised
contact comfort is more important than food ( learning theory eval )
Harlow proved food has nothing to do with attachment
drive reduction theory is largely reduced today
a limited amount of behaviours can be explained but it, many people do activities that increase discomfort eg bungee jumping
alternative explanation for formation of attachments
bowlbys theory can explain why attachments form
Continuity hypothesis
Idea that emotionally secure children go on to become emotionally secure trusting, caring adults
internal working model
a mental model of schemas based on personal experiences used to view and interpret the world
monotrophy
an infant will have one special attachment
social releaser
social behaviour that elicits caring and leads to attachment
Bowlby - why does attachment form
important for survival - being cared for when one is vulnerable
bowlby eval continuity hypothesis study
parent - child study followed children to late adolescence found positive continuity between early attachment and later emotional / social behaviour
Bowlby eval - multiple attachment
secondary attachments are also vital in development but research points to one person higher than all being key to healthy development
Bowlby eval - sensitive period
Rutter showed attachment can still be formed outside of 3-6 month period. It’s more of a sensitive period
strange situation procedure
8 infants in room with/ without mother, with stranger, alone. to record separation anxiety, reunion behaviour, stranger anxiety, exploration behaviours. data recorded every 15 seconds using 5 behavioural categories, on scale of 1-7
ainsworth findings
A insecure avoidant 22%
B secure 66%
C insecure resistant 12%
ainsworth eval other types
D insecure disorganised, from meta analysis of strange situation style study video tapes
ainsworth Eval - observation reliability
high because there was high interobserver reliability 0.94
ainsworth eval - real world application
caregivers can better understand signals of distress - improving childrens lives
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg outline
meta analysis of 32 strange situation style attachment studies in 8 countries
van and kroonenberg findings
secure attachment most common
insecure resistant second ( sauf japan and israel - collectivist )
insecure avoidant third
found more intra cultural differences compared to inter cultural
Cultural differences found in van and kroonenberg study
German children found to be more insecure avoidant - childrearing methods - more interpersonal distance
Japanese children more insecure resistant - rarely experience separation
van and kroonenberg eval similarities may not be innately determined
mass media exposes all to similar influences
van and kroonenberg eval nation rather than culture
urban envrios perform in a more western way whereas more rural parts of eg japan show overrepresentation of insecure resistant attachment