Involuntary Manslaughter - Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Cards (15)

  • GNM - Definition from Adomako
    3 elements for a successful conviction of GNM:
    1. D must owe the V a duty of care
    2. D breaches this duty and this breach causes the death
    3. The negligence is gross which the jury considers to be “criminal”
  • GNM - Test for Duty of Care owed
    Established in Donoghue v Stevenson
    Singh
    Litchfield
    Willoughby
    Evans
  • GNM - DoC, Donoghue v Stevenson
    Lord Atkinson - neighbour principle
    -> there must be a close relationship, with foreseeability of harm
  • GNM - DoC, Singh
    A landlord owed a duty to his tenants to maintain a gas fire
  • GNM - DoC, Litchfield
    The master of a sailing ship owed a duty to the crew when he sailed knowing that the engines would fail
  • GNM - DoC, Willoughby
    there will almost always be a duty of care between doctor and patient
  • GNM - DoC, Evans
    D supplied his sister Carly with heroin, Carly self-injected and D failed to call an ambulance.
    Carly died, D was guilty of GNM.
    Where D creates a dangerous situation, which has become life threatening, there is a duty to act to save a life
  • GNM - this duty has caused the death
    Ordinary rules of causation apply
    Paggett; White
    Kimsey
    Blaue
    Smith; Cheshire; Malcherek; Jordan
    Roberts; Williams and Davies
  • GNM - this duty has caused the death - ‘but for’
    the D must be a ‘but for’ cause of death
    -> White; Paggett
  • GNM - this duty caused the death - Kimsey
    De Minimus rule
  • GNM - this duty has caused the death - Blaue
    Thin skull rule
  • GNM - duty has caused the death - Smith; Cheshire; Malcherek; Jordan

    Novus actus interveniens by a third party
  • GNM - this duty has caused the death - Roberts; Williams and Davies

    Third parties
  • GNM - this duty has caused the death
    natural but unpredictable events
  • GNM - final stage - negligence was “gross”
    Bateman
    -> the negligence is “gross” when it goes:
    —> ’beyond matter of mere compensation between subjects and showed such disregard for the life and safety of others to amount to a crime against the State and conduct deserving of punishment‘