A deep type of conformity where we take on the majority view because we accept it as correct. It leads to a far reaching and permanent change in behaviour, even when the group is absent.
A moderate type of conformity where we act in the same way as the group because we value it and want to be a part of it. But we don't necessarily agree with everything the group/ majority believes
A superficial and temporary type of conformity where we outwardly go along with the majority view, but privately disagree with it. The change in our behaviour only lasts as long as the group is monitoring us.
An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to be correct as well. This may lead to internalisation.
An explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to gain social approval and be liked. This may lead to compliance.
Schultz 2008 discovered that they could change the behaviour of hotel guests by using encouraging printed messages to reserve energy → guests used fewer towels → successful
Study by Todd Lucas, found that participants conformed more often to incorrect answers they were given when the maths problems were difficult. Participants did not want to be wrong, so they relied on the answers they were given.
It's often unclear whether it is NSI or ISI at work in research studies of real life. Hard to separate ISI and NSI and both processes probably operate together in most real-world conformity situations.