How does Parsons say education provides a bridge between family & wider society ?
Secondary Socialisation
- takes over from the family
- "focal socialisation agency"
Bridge between the values of family (focused on personal relationships and ascribed status) and the values of wider society (focused on applying the rules equally to everyone).
How could you criticise the view that education is the bridge between the family and wider society ?
Is society really universalistic? Are people actually treated the same in society, or do factors such as gender and ethnicity still affect the experiences of individuals?
Is society really based on achieved status? Many in the upper class will inherit wealth - they haven't achieved it. Many elite jobs will still favour certain ascribed characteristics.
How much of what you learn at school will you actually need in your job? Functionalists overstate this aspect of school. The content of what people do in their jobs often has very little to do with what they learned in school. Most people learn "on the job".