Conditioning techniques may especially benefit vulnerable groups of children
Frequent use of rewards can lead to a society whereby some individuals are primarily motivated by extrinsic factors
Conditioning techniques are often used to improve outcomes
Conditioning techniques at home
Can be effective when used consistently and calmly
May have unintended emotional effects
Dedicated parenting is required for conditioning techniques to be effective at home
Conditioning techniques are unlikely to be as effective when exposed to inconsistent applications
Some educational approaches believe rewards and punishments advocated by conditioning techniques are harmful to a child's development
Rewards may create a form of learned helplessness in children
Reward systems are not evident in schools from different cultures, yet children seem to be internally motivated
Peer group influences may not always be positive, e.g. children trying smoking due to peer pressure
The Lovaas method has methodological flaws and is incredibly intensive
Conditioning techniques only treat symptoms, so undesirable behaviours may re-emerge once reinforcement is removed
Parents, school, peers and society have an obligation to ensure children develop within the society in which they live
Conditioning techniques can modify behaviour, but there are important ethical considerations, especially for vulnerable groups of children
Skinner believed reinforcements should be used to shape behaviour in a desirable direction, but this raises concerns about manipulation and individuality