abnormal behaviour is seem as a deviation from unstated rules about how one “ought” to behave. anything that violates these rules is considered abnormal.
often in place for good reason, some rules implicit, others governed by law
AO3 susceptible to abuse
what is socially acceptable today may not have been socially acceptable 50 years ago. danger of creating definitions based on prevailing social morals and attitudes.
e.g. homosexuality is mostly accepted now, in the past it was under sexual and gender identity disorders in the DSM
AO3 deviance related to context and degree
social deviance on its own cannot offer a complete definition of abnormality.
e.g. person on beach wearing nothing is normal, person in formal setting wearing nothing is abnormal
AO3 strengths
does distinguish between desirable and undesirable behaviour, feature that was absent in he statistical infrequency model.
takes into account the effect the behaviour has on others.
AO3 cultural relativism
define abnormality in terms of social norms is bound by culture.
classification systems such as DSM, almost entirely based on social norms of the dominant culture in the West (white, middle-class). yet same criteria applied to subcultures.
DSM-V makes reference to cultural contexts e.g. symptom of panic attack.