Dispositional Explanations

    Cards (16)

    • A limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that the F-scale is politically biased.
    • For example, Christie and Jahoda (1954) suggest the F-scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right-wing ideology.
    • However, right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism (e.g. Chinese Maoism) both insist on complete obedience to political authority.
    • This weakens both the validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as it is not a comprehensive dispositional explanation of obedience to authority because it doesn't explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism.
    • Another limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that it is limited.
    • For example, millions of individuals in Germany displayed obedient and anti-semitic behaviour, but didn't have the same personality.
    • It seems unlikely the majority of Germany's population possessed an authoritarian personality.
    • This weakens both the validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as an alternative explanation is more realistic; social identity theory. Most Germans identified with the anti-semitic Nazi state and adopted its views.
    • A limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that it is based on a flawed methodology.
    • For example, Greenstein (1969) suggests the F-scale is 'a comedy of methodological errors'; items are worded in the same 'direction' so the scale just measures the tendency to agree to everything.
    • Also, researchers knew the participants' test scores when they interviewed them, so they knew who had authoritarian personalities. They also knew the study's hypothesis, which makes biased results likely.
    • This weakens both the internal validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as it suggests that the data collected is meaningless.
    • A further limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that much of the research uses correlations.
    • For example, Adorno measured many variables and found significant correlations between them; authoritarianism correlated with prejudice against minority groups.
    • However, no matter how strong a correlation between two variables is, it does not mean that one causes the other.
    • This weakens both the internal validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as Adorno could not claim that harsh parenting style caused development of an authoritarian personality.
    See similar decks