Save
Memory
Cognitive interview
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
um
Visit profile
Cards (9)
what is the CI
a
method
of interviewing
eyewitnesses
to help them
retrieve
more
accurate
memories
View source
Report
Everything
the
interviewer
encourages the
witness
to report
all
details
about the
event
even though these
details
may seem to be
unimportant.
View source
2.
Context
reinstatement
asks the
eyewitness
to try and mentally
recreate
an
image
of the
situation
including details of the
environment
, such as the
weather
conditions
the individual’s
emotional
state including their
feelings
at the
time
of the
incident.
View source
4.
Recall
from
different
perspective
involves trying to
mentally
recreate
the
situation
from different
points
of
view
e.g.
describing
what
another
witness
present at the
scene
would have
seen.
View source
3.
recall
event in a
different
order
witness
is asked to
recall
the scene in a
different
chronological
order
, e.g. from the
end
to the
beginning.
View source
what is the
enhanced
cognitive
interview
Fisher
developed on the original CI.
establishes key social skills that are needed for the interviewer.
For example, they should
maintain
eye
contact
but release it when needed
use
open-ended
questions
asking the witness to speak
slowly.
View source
the CI is
time
consuming
police may be
reluctant
to use CI as it takes much
more
time
than the
standards
police
interview.
the CI also requires
specialist
training
so the police are
unlikely
to use the proper CI.
limits
use even if its
effective
View source
some of the techniques may be more effective than others
Milne
and
Bull
suggested that the recall using
each
individual technique is
similar
but using a
combination
of
report
everything
and
context
reinstatement
produced the best
recall.
This
reduces
the
validity
of the
cognitive
interview
police
officers
only need to use
some
of the
techniques
to improve
accuracy
and so all 4 techniques are not necessarily
needed
or as
effective.
View source
research support for the ECI
Kohnken
et al did a
meta-analysis
found that the cognitive interview increased accuracy by
34
% in comparison to
standard
interviewing.
the
cognitive
interview is
effective
in
improving
the
accuracy
of
eyewitness
testimony.
However, Kohnken et al. also found that there was an
increase
inaccurate
information
cognitive interview produces a
greater
quantity
of
information
but the
quality
of that
information
is
compromised.
question the
effectiveness
of the cognitive interview
View source