If children are more similar to their biological parents with whom they share genes but not environment, than to their adoptive parents with whom they share environment but not genes
Then a trait/behaviour is a result of genetic factors
Those with family history of SZ had more chance of developing the illness (9.4% lifetime risk) than children from families with no history of SZ (1.2% lifetime risk)
However, those children from families with SZ were less likely to develop the illness if placed in a "good" family with kind relationships, empathy, security, etc
Adoption studies control the influence of environment so differences between sets of adoptees can be said to be genetic
Tienari found adoptees whose mother's had SZ had a higher lifetime risk of developing SZ (9.4%) than compared to adoptees whose mothers did not have SZ (1.2%). Therefore the influence of nature vs nurture can be measured
Adoptive studies may lack validity because of selective placement
The adoptive children in Tienari's study may have adoptive families similar to their biological ones. Therefore some of the similarities with biological relatives is actually due to environmental similarities rather than genes
Adoption studies have limited generalisability
Parents in Tienari's study were likely to be better educated, low rates of mental health issues and have high income. Therefore conclusions about the effects of genes on SZ may not be generalisable to the population as a whole