retrieval failure ao1 & 3

Cards (23)

  • Proactive interference
    When new information interferes with the recall of old information
  • Retroactive interference
    When old information interferes with the recall of new information
  • One weakness of interference theory as an explanation of forgetting is that it does not fully account for all types of forgetting
  • Cue-dependent forgetting
    This theory explains forgetting in the LTM as a retrieval failure: the information is stored in the LTM but cannot be accessed
  • Cues
    • Cues which are linked meaningfully to the information to be remembered
    • Cues which are not linked meaningfully to the information to be remembered
  • Context
    External cues encoded when learning information
  • Mental state
    Internal cues encoded when learning information
  • The 'tip of the tongue' phenomenon occurs when we cannot access a memory until the correct retrieval cue is used
  • Cue-dependent forgetting
    1. Encoding of cues
    2. Retrieval of cues
  • Encoding Specificity Principle
    The greater the similarity between the encoding event and the retrieval event, the greater the likelihood of recalling the original memory
  • Context-dependent forgetting
    Forgetting that occurs when the environment during recall is different from the environment you were in when you were learning
  • Godden and Baddeley (1975) study

    • Participants learned lists of words on the beach or underwater
    • Participants recalled the words on the beach or underwater
  • The results showed that participants recalled more words when they learned and recalled in the same environment compared to when they learned and recalled in different environments
  • State-dependent forgetting
    Forgetting that occurs when your mood or physiological state during recall is different from the mood you were in when you were learning
  • Goodwin et al. (1969) study

    • Participants were sober or intoxicated on day 1 and day 2
    • Participants performed various tasks on day 1 and day 2
  • Participants performed worse on day 2 when their state (sober or intoxicated) was different from day 1, except for the picture recognition task
  • Paul forgot his jacket

    He also forgot his wallet
  • The Godden & Baddeley study has limited ecological validity because the environment was familiar to the divers but the task was artificial
  • The Godden & Baddeley study is reliable because it was a controlled experiment that can be replicated
  • The studies on context-dependent and state-dependent forgetting do not take into account the meaning of the material and the level of motivation of the person when learning the information
  • Marian and Fausey (1986) found that memory for a story was better if the language in which it was presented and the language used to test memory were the same
  • The Miles and Hardman (1998) study has limited ecological validity because the tasks performed by the participants were artificial
  • The Miles and Hardman (1998) study is reliable because it was a controlled experiment that can be replicated