May involve a range of behaviours such as crying, screaming or runningaway from the phobic stimulus.
Avoidance
Considerable effort to avoid coming into contact with the phobic stimulus. This can make it hard to go about everyday life, especially if the phobic stimulus is often seen, e.g. public places.
Emotional symptoms
Anxiety and fear
Fear is the immediate experience when a phobic encounters or thinks about the phobic stimulus. Fear leads to anxiety.
Responses are unreasonable
Response is widely disproportionate to the threat pose, e.g. an arachnophobic will have a strong emotional response to a tiny spider.
Cognitive symptoms
Selectiveattention to the phobic stimulus
The phobic finds it hard to look away from the phobic stimulus e.g. a person with a fear of beards cannot concentrate on a task if there is a bearded man in the room.
Irrational beliefs
For example, social phobias may involve beliefs such as 'if I blush people will think I'm weak'.
The two-process model - classical and operant conditioning.
Mowrer argued that phobias are learned by classical conditioning and maintained by operant conditioning, i.e. twoprocesses are involved.
Acquisition by classical conditioning
Involves association.
UCS triggers a fear response (fear = UCR), e.g. being bitten creates anxiety.
NS is associated with the UCS, e.g. being bitten by a dog.
NS becomes a CS producing fear (now the CR). The dog becomes a CS causing a CR of anxiety/fear following the bite.
Little Albert: conditioned fear.
Watson and Raynor showed how a fear of rats could be conditioned in 'Little Albert'.
Whenever Albert played with a white rat, a loud noise was made close to his ear. The noise caused a fearresponse.
Rat did not create fear until the bang and the rat had been paired togetherseveral times.
Albert showed a fear response every time he came into contact with the rat.
Generalisation of fear to other stimuli.
Little Albert also showed a fearresponse to other whitefurryobjects, including a fur coat, and a SantaClaus mask.
Maintenance by operant conditioning (negative reinforcement).
When a phobic avoids a phobic stimulus they escape the anxiety that would have been experienced.
This reduction in fear negatively reinforces the avoidance behaviour and the phobia is maintained.
Strength of the two process model - has good explanatory power.
The model went beyond Watson and Raynor's simple classical conditioning explanation. This explanation has important implications for therapy; if a patient is prevented from practising their avoidance behaviour then the phobic behaviour declines. The application to therapy is extremely important.
Two limitations of the two-process model.
Not allbad experiences lead to phobias
Sometimes they do, which exemplifies the role of conditioning. However DiNardo showed that some people undergo a traumatic occurrence and don't develop a phobia. Suggests that conditioning alone cannotfullyexplain phobias.
Alternative explanations for avoidance behaviour
In some more complex phobias avoidance can be motivated by more positive feelings like safety. Limitation because juxtaposes explanation.