Protecting the identity of participants by making them unidentifiable based on the data collected
Concern for Welfare
Principal that research should maximize benefits and minimize harm
Confederate
A person posing in the experiment that is actually apart of the research
Confidential
Principle that information is kept private and only disclosed to a minimum number of people
Debriefing
AN explanation of the purpose of research given after their participation
Deception
When a researcher misleads participants into thinking something about the study that is not true
Ethics Codes
Guidelines for ethical conduct developed by professional societies
Exempt Research
There is not risk to participants and so the research is exempt from REB review
Fraud
The intential misrepresentation of any aspect of research
Informed consent
Principle that potential participants must be informed in advance of all aspects of the research that may influence their decision to participate
Justice
Principle that all individuals should have fair and qual access to benefits of research participation, and bear the risks equally
Minimal Risk Research
Involves no greater risk to participants than they typically encounter
Plagiarism
The intentional or unintentional use of another persons work, or ideas, without indicating the source
Research Ethics Board
An ethical review committee that reviews research proposals withing a university
Composed of scientists, non-scientist, and legal experts
Respect for Persons
Ethical principle that all individuals should have the free and informed choice to participate or not in research
Risk Benefit Analysis
Evaluation of the potential hazards of conducting a study weighed against the potential benefits (practical application)
Secondary use of data
Analyzing data collected for other purposes than the current research
Three Rs
In animal research the principles of replacement (avoiding use), reduction (minimizing hoe many used) and refinement (Modifying procedures to minimize distress)
Tri-Council Policy Statement
Official statement of ethical conduct for research involving humans. Researchers and institutions are expected to adhere to this document to receive federal funding
Milgram'sStudy
Participants told study was looking at memory and learning, it was actually looking at authority and obedience
after debriefing only 1% of participants wish that hadn't been in the study, the showed that debriefing removed negative effects of participating
Tri-Council is made up of three federally funded research grant agencies
Canadian Institute of health research (CIHR)
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Nuremburg Code
Participants should consent to participate in research
Participants should be fully informed about the research purpose
Risk should be avoided when possible
Participants should be protected from risks
Only scientifically qualified people should conduct research
Participants have the right to withdraw at any time
Tuskegee Syphilis Study denied medical treatment to black men with syphilis in order to study longer term effects of the illness
Research expect from REB review
Only uses publicly available information
Only involves observing people in public places without interaction from researcher, and not identifiable
Uses data that has already been collected and is anonymous
Animal Care Committees must have
One scientist or teacher with experience in animal use
One Institutionalmember that doesn't use animals
One experiencedveterinarian
A community member
Fraud can be committed in two ways
Fabricating data
Collecting data but then altering it to hit the hypothesis
Asset
When a minor agrees to participate even if the parents have already given consent.