free-flowing conversation between researcher and interviewee
no fixed, standardised format
produce rich, detailed qualitative data that gives a real insight into meanings and world of interviewee
practical advantages
informality allows raport - puts interviewee at ease
make it easier to check eachothers meanings
they are flexible, interviewer are not restricted to fixed set of questions and can form new hypotheses and put them to to the test as they arise
useful on a subject little is known - open ended and explorative
practical disadvantages
training needs to be more thorough so they can recognise a sociologically important point - adds to the cost
take a long time - may limit the sample because they take so long
produce large amounts of data which can take time to transcribe - no pre-coded answers, making categorisation of data difficult
theoretical issues: validity
valid data can only be attained by understanding people's experiences and meanings
by becoming involved during interview, we see world through their eyes and appreciate what is important to them and why they act the way they do
grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1968)
reject the positivist idea that research involves beginning with a fixed hypothesis that we test by collecting data
important to approach the research with an open mind to discover truth about actors' meanings
devolop grounded theory - we build up and modify our hypothesis during actual course of research itself
unstructured interviews are unideal tool to pursue lines of questioning
interviewee's view
absence of a pre-set structure of fixed questions gives them freedom to raise issues and bring fresh insights
theoretical issues: positivism
lacks objectivity and reliability, fails to produce represenative data that can be generalised
not reliable - not standardised measuring instrument as each interview is unique, impossible to replicate or find meanings
can be quantified - open ended questions cannot be easily categorised, less useful for correlating variables,
hard to test hypothesis and establish cause effect relationships
lack of validity
positivist argue that rapport and freeflowing coversation may distort infomation obtained e.g. interviewee may want to please researcher
not all sociologists used rapport - becker used aggression, disbelief and 'playing dumb' to get teachers to reveal how they classified pupils
interviews yeild qualititative data which may undermine validity as answers are not precoded and sociologists has to analyse data as they see fit - positivists argue inevitably involves researcher making value judgements
feminism
Oakley argues that research should:
be value committed - takes womens side and gives voice
requires the researcher's involvement rather than detachment
aims for equality and collaboration
interpretivism and qualitative methods
interpretivists reject the idea that sociology should model itself on science
reject that social reality as a set of objective facts - see it as subjective meanings internal to peoples success
can only understand society by interpreting the meanings people give to their actions
practical issues in participant observation (getting in)
access is hard as researcher must gain groups trust and adopt particular role
hard to access groups who engage in deviant activities
must be involved in group and activities but also detached
researcher may develop loyalty to the group
practical advantages
it gives insight into peoples lives by allowing us to put ourselves in their place - process known as verstehen (empathy or subjective understanding)
produces rich, detailed qualitative data
flexibility - form new hypotheses and research questions, gain answers to questions you dont even know
practical disadvantages
fieldwork = time consuming and take years to complete
researcher must be sociologically trained - recognise aspects, significant and worth investigating
personally stressful or dangerous
powerful groups may be able to resist sociologists studying them