qualitative research methods

Cards (13)

  • unstructured interviews
    • free-flowing conversation between researcher and interviewee
    • no fixed, standardised format
    • produce rich, detailed qualitative data that gives a real insight into meanings and world of interviewee
  • practical advantages
    • informality allows raport - puts interviewee at ease
    • make it easier to check eachothers meanings
    • they are flexible, interviewer are not restricted to fixed set of questions and can form new hypotheses and put them to to the test as they arise
    • useful on a subject little is known - open ended and explorative
  • practical disadvantages
    • training needs to be more thorough so they can recognise a sociologically important point - adds to the cost
    • take a long time - may limit the sample because they take so long
    • produce large amounts of data which can take time to transcribe - no pre-coded answers, making categorisation of data difficult
  • theoretical issues: validity
    • valid data can only be attained by understanding people's experiences and meanings
    • by becoming involved during interview, we see world through their eyes and appreciate what is important to them and why they act the way they do
  • grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1968)
    • reject the positivist idea that research involves beginning with a fixed hypothesis that we test by collecting data
    • important to approach the research with an open mind to discover truth about actors' meanings
    • devolop grounded theory - we build up and modify our hypothesis during actual course of research itself
    • unstructured interviews are unideal tool to pursue lines of questioning
  • interviewee's view
    • absence of a pre-set structure of fixed questions gives them freedom to raise issues and bring fresh insights
  • theoretical issues: positivism
    • lacks objectivity and reliability, fails to produce represenative data that can be generalised
    • not reliable - not standardised measuring instrument as each interview is unique, impossible to replicate or find meanings
    • can be quantified - open ended questions cannot be easily categorised, less useful for correlating variables,
    • hard to test hypothesis and establish cause effect relationships
  • lack of validity
    • positivist argue that rapport and freeflowing coversation may distort infomation obtained e.g. interviewee may want to please researcher
    • not all sociologists used rapport - becker used aggression, disbelief and 'playing dumb' to get teachers to reveal how they classified pupils
    • interviews yeild qualititative data which may undermine validity as answers are not precoded and sociologists has to analyse data as they see fit - positivists argue inevitably involves researcher making value judgements
  • feminism
    • Oakley argues that research should:
    • be value committed - takes womens side and gives voice
    • requires the researcher's involvement rather than detachment
    • aims for equality and collaboration
  • interpretivism and qualitative methods
    • interpretivists reject the idea that sociology should model itself on science
    • reject that social reality as a set of objective facts - see it as subjective meanings internal to peoples success
    • can only understand society by interpreting the meanings people give to their actions
  • practical issues in participant observation (getting in)
    • access is hard as researcher must gain groups trust and adopt particular role
    • hard to access groups who engage in deviant activities
    • must be involved in group and activities but also detached
    • researcher may develop loyalty to the group
  • practical advantages
    • it gives insight into peoples lives by allowing us to put ourselves in their place - process known as verstehen (empathy or subjective understanding)
    • produces rich, detailed qualitative data
    • flexibility - form new hypotheses and research questions, gain answers to questions you dont even know
  • practical disadvantages
    • fieldwork = time consuming and take years to complete
    • researcher must be sociologically trained - recognise aspects, significant and worth investigating
    • personally stressful or dangerous
    • powerful groups may be able to resist sociologists studying them