cherry - cocktail party phenomenon, we can only attend to one voice in a crowd
broad bents attention model: sensory store - selective filter - higher level of processing - working memory
aim - test cherrys dichotic listening findings in relation to the amount of information recognised, whether hearing ones name in the unattended message increases attention
e1
method: repeated measures design
procedure: short list of words spoken 35 times in one ear rejected, or prose in the other shadowed. then completed 21 word recognition list
results: 5/7 words remembered in shadowed message, 2/7 in the rejected message
e2
method: repeated md, iv - whether instructions in the message before or after name, dv - frequency in which the instruction was heard
sample - 12 researches and undergrads, opportunity sampling
procedure; shadowed prose, rejected list of instructions and name included, told to make as little mistakes as possible
results: the presence of the name can cause instructions to be heard as it broke through the attentional barrier
e3
method: independent md, iv-manipulation of instructions given
sample: 28 (2x14) undergrads and researchers, opportunity sampling
procedure: prose shadowed, 1 group told they would be asked about the shadowed message, 1 group told they had to remember as many numbers as possible
results: no difference in number of digits remembered, digits do not break attentional barrier
conclusions
when attention is directed to one ear, almost all verbal content is blocked in the other
subjectively important messages such as ones name can penetrate the barrier allowing us to hear instructions
difficult for neutral material to penetrate the barrier