types of data

Cards (15)

  • types of data - qualitative data 

    data which is displayed in words, is non-numerical
  • types of data - qualitative data strengths
    more richness and depth of detail and allows participants to further develop their opinions creating a higher external validity
  • types of data - qualitative data limitations
    difficult to analyse and researcher bias as responses are interpreted subjectively by the researcher
  • types of data - quantitative data
    data that is displayed numerically, not in words
  • types of data - quantitative datastrengths 

    can be analysed statistically so converted to graphs or charts and easy to make comparisons with other data
  • types of data - quantitative datalimitations

    lack of depth in detail as participants cannot develop their opinions meaning it has low external validity
  • types of data - primary data
    when information is obtained first hand by the researcher for an investigation
  • types of data - primary data strength
    targets the exact information which the researcher needs so the data fits their aims and objectives
  • types of data - primary data limitations

    it requires time and effort and may be expensive
  • types of data - secondary data
    when information is collected by someone else other than the researcher in the investigation, also known as desk research
  • types of data - secondary data strengths
    data is already collected so it requires minimal effort
  • types of data - secondary data limitations
    the data may not be reliable as the researcher who collected the data would have been for a different study
  • types of data - meta-analysis
    when a researcher combines results from many different studies and uses all data to form an overall view of the subject they are investigating
  • types of data - meta-analysis strengths
    more generalisability is possible as a larger amount of data is studied
  • types of data - meta-analysis limitations
    publication bias as the researcher chose to leave out some results giving a false representation of what the researcher was investigating