Save
PSYCH PAPER 2
research methods
types of data
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
georgia hogg
Visit profile
Cards (15)
types of data -
qualitative
data
data which is displayed in words, is
non-numerical
types of data - qualitative data strengths
more
richness
and depth of detail and allows participants to further develop their opinions creating a higher
external
validity
types of data - qualitative data limitations
difficult to
analyse
and researcher
bias
as responses are interpreted subjectively by the researcher
types of data - quantitative data
data that is displayed
numerically
, not in
words
types of data - quantitative datastrengths
can be analysed statistically so converted to
graphs
or
charts
and easy to make comparisons with other data
types of data - quantitative datalimitations
lack of
depth
in detail as participants cannot develop their opinions meaning it has low
external
validity
types of data - primary data
when information is obtained first hand by the researcher for an
investigation
types of data - primary data strength
targets the exact information which the researcher needs so the data fits their
aims
and
objectives
types of data -
primary
data limitations
it requires
time
and effort and may be
expensive
types of data - secondary data
when information is collected by someone else other than the
researcher
in the investigation, also known as
desk research
types of data - secondary data strengths
data is already
collected
so it requires
minimal
effort
types of data - secondary data limitations
the data may not be
reliable
as the researcher who collected the data would have been for a
different
study
types of data - meta-analysis
when a researcher combines results from many different studies and uses all data to form an
overall
view of the subject they are
investigating
types of data - meta-analysis strengths
more
generalisability
is possible as a
larger
amount of data is studied
types of data - meta-analysis
limitations
publication bias
as the researcher chose to
leave out
some results giving a false representation of what the researcher was investigating