should be scientific and objective so only study observable behaviour not mental processes, use experimental method in lab control
born as blank slate, all behaviour learn from experience of events in envir, connections of event stimulus and behaviour response, learned through reinforce or punish
behaviour determined by enviro, controlled by forces rather than will of person
follows darwin so idea that processes of behavioir same in all specues so valid to use animal studies
2 forms of learning
classical conditioning
association, Pavlovs dog NS bell UCS food UCR salivation, CS bell CR salivation
operant conditioning
learned by consequences (say all 4 consequences and meaning)
BF skinners rats, in box with lever, pull lever and pellet of food = positive reinforcement, behaviour repeated
strength
based on well controlled research
observsble behaviour in controlled lab setting
broke down behaviour into simple SR units, removing all other EV allowing causal relationship
EG skinner able to demonstrate how reinforcement shaped rats behaviour
scientific credibility
counter limitation
reductionist
oversimplified learning process
reducing down to SR links ignores importance of human thought on learning as recognised in SLT and CA drawing attention to mental processes
learning more complex than observable behaviour
strength
RWA
principles applied, OC principle basis of token economy systems used successfully in institutions eg prison
reward appropriate behaviour with tokens exchanged for privileges
principles applied to treatment eg conditioning used in exposure therapy for phobia
value of approach
limitation
environmental determinism
sees all behavuour as conditioned by past conditioning experiences
skinner - everything we do sum total of reinforcement history
ignored possible influence of free will on behaviour, skinner described as illusion
extreme position and ignores influence of conscious decision making