Save
Psychology
Component 2
PI 2
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Chloe Weymouth
Visit profile
Cards (25)
Non-participant
observation
An observation where the experimenter is
separate
from the people being observed,dont take part in the
investigation
Takao
et al
Females
are more likely to depend on their phones more than
males
aim
To find out if girls or
boys
depend on their
phones
more or less than each other
IV
Gender
DV
Addictiveness
Directional hypothesis
Takao
et a supports the research
Girls are more addicted to their
phones
than
boys
Operationalise IV
Boys or
girls
Operationalise DV
number of times someone picks up their phone
5
or more times=
addicted
Alternative
hypothesis
There will be a difference between girls,who pick up their phone
5
or more time in
20
minutes,compared to boys
Null hypothesis
There will be no difference between girls,who pick up their phones more
5 5
times in
20
minutes,compared to boys
Confounding variables
How many notifications they received
Phone battery
Age
Extraneous variable
Weather warning on phone
Strength of non-participant observation
more
objective
,not part of the group
more
reliable
Weakness of non-participant observation
no special
insights
Independent
groups
Opportunity
sampling
Mean
was used
Bar
chart
Nominal
data
Chi squared
difference
(boys and girls)
nominal
data in categories
Independent
groups
Test-retest reliability
conduct research again on a
different
day and
time
Researcher
bias
Ethics
Confidentiality
,everyone remains
anonymous
Valid
consent
,fill out a consent form ad have right to
withdraw
Procedure
find a group of pp(equal amount of boys and girls) and sat around them but not with them
started a
20
minute timer and marker down every time a pp picked up their phone using a
tally
After
20
minutes inform all pp they were being observed and asked for
consent
so the data could be used
Evaluation
bigger sample,more
representative
different time of day,people may use
phones
more at different
times
of the the day
different
location
,people may use their phones more or less while at college
Age
,cant
generalise
as all pp were school students
IV
wasnt directly manipulated by researcher,cant make
casual
conclusions