research should be replicable, if repeated the results would be the same
all variables should be operationalised
the judgements should be fair and unbiased
should be objective(fact based)rather than subjective
should use nomothetic approaches producing quantitative data
it aims to research is a reductionist, deterministic manner
theory construction
uses direct observation to gather evidence, which researchers may then conduct a study into
hypothesis testing
occurs when objective methods are used to find evidence to support or contradict a theory
new hypothesis derived from previous theories= deduction
falsifiability
popper argues that science is unique, scientists do not try to prove themselves right, they instead try to falsify their work first
good science should constantly be challenged and have the potential to be falsified
psychologists try to avoid using 'this proves' and always include a null hypothesis(which can be accepted if falsified)
replicability
in order to test in science, as suggested by popper, then research needs to be replicable(thus can be falsified)
if it is repeated with the same results we can trust the theory as it has reliability
if it can be repeated across different contexts then it improves the external validity as researchers can generalise findings
paradigms
paradigm=a set of shared ideas/assumptions within a scientific discipline
paradigm shift= a significant change in these assumptions following scientific revolution
kuhn suggests paradigms are what seperate scientific disapline from non scientific- psychology has too many disagreements and conflicting approaches so isnt a science(pre-science)