self report techniques

• Self-report Techniques


  When the participant reveals personal information about themselves when answering a series of questions
• Self-report Techniques


  • Usually collected by either questionnaire or interviews
• Questionnaires


  Can have both open and closed questions
• Open questions


  Allow the participant to write down their own answer, often seen as having more validity
• Qualitative data


  Not numerical, can make analysis very difficult but can provide depth and insight into an answers that the researcher might not otherwise get, can also provide a push-point for further questions if needed
• Closed questions


  Provide the participant with a selection of answers to choose from, can seem less valid as it pre-determines the selection of answers
• Quantitative data


  Easier to analyse and spot patterns but sacrifices the level of detail and insight that you would get with open questions
• Structured Interviews


  The interviewer reads out a list of prepared questions for the participant to answer, the interviewer does not deviate from the prepared questions
• Structured Interviews


  • Strengths: The answers are easy to compare as the same questions were asked

  Limitations: The interview does not need to have intensive training to ask the questions, the pre-determined questions may not provide the relevant data required for the investigation, response by the participants cannot be followed up with additional questions to add more detail as there is a prescribed list of questions
• Unstructured Interviews


  The interviewer has a topic of interest they want to discuss with the interviewee, there is no set list of questions, instead it is an open conversation about the topic, which allows the interviewer to ask questions specific to the interviewee and gain further information
• Unstructured Interviews


  • Strengths: The interviewer is able to build a rapport with the interviewee, which is more likely to allow for honest answers thus increasing validity, interesting answers can be followed up for more information as there is not a prescribed list of questions

  Limitations: The interviewer has to be responsive to the participant and ready to come up with suitable questions on the spot, every interview will be different, making comparisons difficult, the interviewer will need specific training to ensure that questions, whilst responsive, aren't leading or show bias
• Semi-Structured Interviews


  The interviewer uses a combination of set questions, with the ability to ask extra questions to gather more information
• Semi-Structured Interviews


  • Strengths: Comparison is easier than for an unstructured interview as the same questions are asked for part of the interview, the interviewer can gather more information by asking further questions or asking the participant to expand on the answers they have given, rapport can be built as the interviewer can ask more questions and relax the interviewee

  Limitations: The interviewer has to be responsive to the participant and ready to come up with suitable questions on the spot if they feel that this is necessary, the interviewer, as with unstructured interviews, would need specific training to avoid asking leading questions or loaded questions (with bias)