accuracy of scanner in relation to time (i.e. how quickly scanner detects changes in brain activity).
Spatial Resolution:
smallest feature that scanner can detect.
greater the spatial resolution allows discrimination between different brain regions w/ accuracy.
2. Ways of Investigating the Brain
fMRI (Functional MagneticReasoning Imaging):
used measure activity while performing task.
does this by measuring changes in bloodflow in areas of brain, using magneticfields/radiowaves.
they show increased neural activity in areas.
2a. Ways of Investigating the Brain
fMRI:
when brain area moreactive, consume more oxygen.
to meet demand, blood flow directed to active area to deliver O2 in red blood cells.
amount of oxygenated blood changes + has magnetic signature - detected by fMRI.
speed they return to original position, measure amount of oxygenated haemoglobin = can produce maps showing which brain areas involved in certain mental activity.
2b. Ways of Investigating the Brain (Evaluation)
fMRI - Strengths:
noradiation; risk-free + non-invasive.
accuracy produces images w/ high spatialresolution (1-2mm).
shows how brain activity localised.
fMRI - Limitations:
expensive.
only captures clear image if person perfectly still.
poor temporal resolution (5-sec time lag).
only measure blood flow in brain, not neural activity, so can’t tell exactly what brain activity represented.
3. Ways of Investigating the Brain
EEG (Electroencephalogram):
measures electrical activity in brain, via electrodes placed on scalp (skullcap).
detect small electrical charges from neuralactivity (i.e. measures neurons’ activity).
scan recording represents brainwave patterns, generated from action of millions of neurons = account of brain activity.
recording of general brain activity linked to states like sleep/arousal.
more specificity to measurements of neuralprocesses than EEG can achieve alone.
hightemporal resolution (derived from EEG measurements) = widespread use in measuring cognitive functions; identify diff types of ERP + role in cog functioning.
ERPs - Limitations:
lack standardisation in ERP methodology between diff studies, difficult to confirm findings.
to establish pure data in studies, background noise + extraneous material MUST be removed completely, not always possible.
5. Ways of Investigating the Brain
Post-MortemExamination:
brain analysed after death to determine whether behaviours in patient’s life linked to abnormalities in brain.
used when person likely has disorder and experienced unusual deficits in mental process/behaviour.
areas of damage examined after death, establish case of affliction.
comparison to neurotypical brain.
5a. Ways of Investigating the Brain (Evaluation)
PME - Strengths:
vital in providing foundation for early understanding of brain.
Paul Broca + Karl Wernicke relied on post-morterms in establishing links between language, brain + behaviours decades before neuro-imaging possible.
improve medical knowledge + generate hypotheses for new study.
PME - Limitations:
causation issue; damage may not link to deficits but other unrelated trauma/decay.
ethical issues; informedconsent (e.g. case of HM, no consent).