A term for the effects of living in an institutional setting.
In attachment we are interested in the effects of institutional care (e.g. orphanage) on children’s attachment and development.
The possible effects include: social, mental and physical underdevelopment.
Some of these effects may be irreversible.
Rutter & Songua-Barke (2010) - ERA (English and Romanian Adoptee) Study
Rutter & Songua-Barke's Study on Early Institutional procedure
• Followed 165 Romanian orphans since 1990s.
• Assessed physical,cognitive, and emotional development at ages 4, 6, 11, and 15.
• Control group consisted of 52British children adopted at the same time.
Findings
• Romanian orphans lack physical, cognitive, and social development.
• Show signs of mentalretardation and severe undernutrition.
• Recovery rates linked to adoption age.
• Most adopted before6 months catch up with British adoptees.
• Significant deficits in institutional care beyond 6 months.
• Many adopted after 6 months have peerrelationshipsproblems.
• Disinhibited attachment observed due to lack of sufficient carers in institutions. - overfriendlieness
Other studies of Romanian Orphans
Procedure
Zeenah et al. (2005) compared 136 Romanian children who had, on average, spent 90% of their lives in an institution to a control group of Romanian children who had neverbeen in an institution.
The children were 12-31 months and were assessed using the Strange Situation.
Other studies of Romanian Orphans
Findings
Institutionalised group:
19% securely attached
44% disinhibited attachment
Control group:
74% securely attached
< 20% disinhibited attachment
Effects of Institutionalisation on Children
• Physical underdevelopment: Children in institutions often have small physical stature due to deprivation dwarfism.
• Disinhibited attachment: Children exhibit equal friendliness towards familiar and unfamiliar individuals, often overfriending strangers.
• Poor parenting: Women reared in institutions face significant difficulties in their 20s as parents.
AO3:
• criticisms - individual differences if children may play an important role
although some research suggests that individuals who do not form primary attachment within early sensitive period unable to recover this is not true for all children experiencing institutionalisation
• Some children may not recover as strongly from institutionalisation as others.
• Rutter suggests that some children recieved Special attention in institutions
• suggests that Findings of institutionalisation research are not universal, and some children may recover from negative effects.
Real-life Applications of Institutionalisation Research - strength
• Research into institutionalisation can improve the lives of children in care.
• Early adoption is crucial, as traditional mothers were encouraged to nurse the baby for a long time.
• Today, most babies are adopted within the first week of birth, demonstrating secure attachments between adopted mothers and children.
• Institutionalisation research can significantly improve the lives of children.
Longitudinal Studies in Institutionalisation Research - strength
• Institutionalisation research often includes longitudinal studies.
• Rutter and Songua-Barke's studies follow children's lives over years.
• These studies require extensive planning and time for results.
• They show effects of institutional care may disappear with high-quality care.
• Longitudinal studies validate the effect of institutionalisation.
Critique of Romanian Orphan Studies
• Deprivation is a single factor in Romanian orphan studies.
• Physical conditions and lack of cognitive stimulation also impact orphans' health.
• Multiple risk factors may have caused damage.
• suggest that Researchers should interpret studies cautiously due to multiple potential factors.