works on the basis of a drop of water hitting the surface of a lake - it creates ripples. The closer you are to the drop of water the stronger the ripple. Those closest to the location of the change occuring are more likely to pick up the change
Peter Trudgill (criticises wave model)
Believes that changes comes from big cities, is passed to big towns, and then to smaller towns, missing out country dwellings. Uses Yorkshire as an example, where archaic 'thee' and 'thou' are still used
chen's 's-curve' model
point 1: the change is made and there is some uptake (usually spread through a social group)
point 2: more people use it, but it is still limited to a geographical region or group
point 3: many more people know it
Jean Aitchison - PIDC model
potential - gap or potential to change
implementation - change occurs
diffusion - change spreads
codification - change is made official
halliday's functional theory
language change is a result of the needs and requirements its users
lexical gaps - gap in the lexicon for something which needs describing
function shifts - a word exists but we need a different word class (eg: 'google' is a noun, verb and adjective
Hockett's 'random fluctuation theory'
when someone makes an error, these can be standardised and recognised as somewhat synonymus
substratum theory
explains how changes can be made as a result of interactions with other languages and variations of English. (British English saw increase in 'like' as an intensifier as a result of American English use of it on TV shows like 'FRIENDS')
aitchison's prescriptivist models
damp spoon syndrome - leaving a damp spoon in the sugar. People are becoming lazy and disrespectful of language
infectious disease - the idea that changes are like germs which spread and infect the language
crumbling castle - the idea that English was at a 'golden age' and is now in a state of disrepair
Types of lexical change
Blending
Clipping
Compounding
Conversion
Derivation
Back formation
Reduplication
Neologising
Borrowing
Acronymising
Initialising
Eponyming
Blending
2 existing words are fused to make a new one (e.g. smog)
Clipping
Part of a word is removed, but meaning is the same (e.g. sync)
Compounding
2 existing words are stuck together to form a new word (e.g. blackbird)
Conversion
Word class of an existing word is changed (e.g. noun of 'text' to verb 'text')
Derivation
Adding bound morpheme to change class (e.g. adding 'ing' onto noun 'text' to make the verb 'texting')
Back formation
Removal of a morpheme to change class (e.g. verb 'enthuse' comes from noun 'enthusiasm')
Reduplication
Repetition of words which are the same or similar (e.g. nitty-gritty)
Neologising
Creating a new word (e.g. yeet)
Borrowing
Words taken from another language (e.g. infant from French)
Acronymising
Forming a word and is formed of the initials it is describing (e.g. NASA, NATO, SCUBA)
Initialising
Words that are said as individual letters (e.g. BBC)
Eponyming
Forming a word based on a person's name (e.g. hoover from the brand Hoover)
types of semantic change
neosemy: word gains a new meaning
pejoration: word gains a negative meaning
narrowing: word gains a more specific meaning
amelioration: word gains a more positive meaning
weaking/bleaching: word loses original power
broadening: word gains a less specific and more general meaning
the great vowel shift - 15th to 18th centuries
Gutenberg - creator of the printing press
Cawdrey - wrote the first dictionary to provide definitions and terms
Murray
We should not use split infinitives. It should be 'to walk proudly', not 'to proudly walk'
Pinker - Euphemism treadmill
As a euphemism stops being used, a new one arrives to replace it, leading to a constant cycle
lexical gap theory
States that new words enter our language where there is a space for it when we need to express something. For example, when the wireless internet was made, there was a gap for naming it