Save
...
PSYCH PAPER 3
forensic psychology
bottom up offender profiling
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
.
Visit profile
Cards (11)
investigative psychology
developed by
Canter
proposed profiling should be based on psych theory and research
interpersonal coherence
people are
consistent
in their behaviour, so there will be links with how people behave in everyday life
but may change over time
forensic awareness
past experience
eg. rapists who conceal
fingerprints
often had previous burglary conviction
smallest space analysis
statistical technique by
Canter
data about many crime
scenes
and
offender
characteristics are correlated
themes: instrumental
opportunistic
, instrumental
cognitive
,
expressive impulsive
geographical profiling
analyses
locations
of connected series of crimes
considers where crimes committed,
spatial
relationships, how this may link to offender's place of residence
circle theory
Canter
and
Larkin
if crimes are similar in nature and plotted on a map may be possible to join to form circle, criminal would live in centre -
marauder
commuters
- travel to another location, may also commit crimes within defined circles
criminal geographic targeting (CGT)
Rossmo
3D
map showing
probability
of offender residence
jeopardy surface
scientific basis of approach
not as scientific as claimed
uses objective
statistical
techniques and computer analysis (appears scientific)
BUT data used to drive systems is based only on caught offenders, doesn't tell us much about
unsolved
crime
also, someone has to develop the systems and may do it wrong
potential to be scientific, but inevitably
biased
usefulness of investigative psychology
is it useful?
Copson
surveyed
48
UK police forces - 75% said profilers advice useful, only 3% said advice actually helped identify offender
most said they'd use
again
may not be useful in catching, but does have slight
benefits
lack of success of circle theory
Canter
and
Larkin
study
91
% identified as
marauders
- if almost all not v useful as classification
Pethrick
pointed out flaws - if
home
not in centre may look in wrong place, circles are oversimplistic may be
ellipsis
or other
little usefulness
lack of value in geographic profiling
issue
can't distinguish between
multiple
offenders in one area
limited to spatial characteristics, no
personality
not more useful than simple method of
pins
on map to see pattern
See similar decks
OCR GCSE Psychology
No cards
AQA GCSE Psychology
No cards
AP Psychology
No cards
Unit 4: Social Psychology and Personality
AP Psychology
No cards
1.1.4 Sexual Offences
OCR GCSE Psychology > Unit 1: Criminal Psychology > 1.1 Different Types of Crime
12 cards
4.7 Emotion
AP Psychology > Unit 4: Social Psychology and Personality
81 cards
5. Sports psychology
AQA GCSE Physical Education
No cards
5.1 Introduction to Health Psychology
AP Psychology > Unit 5: Mental and Physical Health
68 cards
1.4 Theories of Criminality
OCR GCSE Psychology > Unit 1: Criminal Psychology
No cards
5. Sports psychology
GCSE Physical Education
No cards
4.3 Psychology of Social Situations
AP Psychology > Unit 4: Social Psychology and Personality
55 cards
3.1 Themes and Methods in Developmental Psychology
AP Psychology > Unit 3: Development and Learning
88 cards
5.2 Positive Psychology
AP Psychology > Unit 5: Mental and Physical Health
18 cards
Unit 4: Social Influence
OCR GCSE Psychology
No cards
Unit 1: Criminal Psychology
OCR GCSE Psychology
No cards
Unit 6: Sleep and Dreaming
OCR GCSE Psychology
No cards
2.1 Early Brain Development
OCR GCSE Psychology > Unit 2: Development
No cards
10.7 Utilizing Past Papers and Mark Schemes
OCR A-Level French > Exam Preparation
69 cards
5.3 Research Studies in Memory
OCR GCSE Psychology > Unit 5: Memory
96 cards
2.7 Forgetting and Other Memory Challenges
AP Psychology > Unit 2: Cognition
33 cards
1.4 Research Methods
AQA GCSE Psychology > Unit 1: Cognition and Behaviour
No cards