girls are now out performing boys so the system must not be patriachal.
LIBERAL - SUE SHARPE
girls wishes in the future
1970s - prioritized family
1990s- wanted a career and education
shows how girls are becoming more independent and want to make a success for themselves
LIBERAL - HEATON & LAWTON
the hidden curriculum (bowles and gintis) clearly shows patriachy
SKELTON & FRANCIS
when observing primary school play, peer groups were gendered with boys playing sports, girls playing house etc (socialisation effects) and saw that girls were not allowed to play with the boys
double standards
girls who are loud and dominate the classroom are seen as attention seekers where as loud boys are 'normal' and expected
RADICAL - BAYNARD
school research shows that sexual harassment boy -> girl is not taken serious and often said to just be a 'joke'
RADICAL - BAYNARD
verbal comments made by boys are ignored.
RADICAL
the classroom is seen as a training ground of the male gaze and boys sexism
RADICAL
experience harassment in school is shown to discourage girls in schools; not attending, giving up
RADICAL
education still favours boys over girls
EVALUATIONS OF FEMINISTS
education isnt the issue, high achieving girls will get into good jobs but then be effected by the gender pay gap.
the teaching industry is becoming female dominant; so the ideologies of the female teachers will begin to become present in the classroom