Rylands v Fletcher

Cards (7)

  • Introduction
    The rule
    • Lord Goff - "Essentially an extension of the law of nuisance to isolated escapes from land"
    • "FOR PURPOSES OF HIS OWN BRINGS ONTO LAND AND ACCUMULATES ANYTHING LIKELY TO CAUSE MISCHIEF IF IT ESCAPES, WHICH AMOUNTS TO A NON-NATURAL USE OF LAND, AND WHICH DOES ESCAPE AND CAUSES REASONABLY FORESEEABLE DAMAGE"
    CAMBRIDGE WATER CO V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER
    • Originally a strict liability offence till case above
    • Any damage caused by an escape had to be REASONABLY FORESEEABLE not the escape itself
    Parties:
    • Read v Lyons - Proprietary interest
    • Personal injury is not recoverable
  • Stage 1
    A Bringing on to Land & Accumulating
    • D must bring something onto the land
    • There is no liability for something naturally on the land which escapes
    • GILES v WALKER – weeds​
    • ELLISON – water
    • But there is liability if D has adopted the nuisance​ - LEAKEY
    • RYLANDS – large amount of water​
    • CAMBRIDGE - Chemicals
  • Stage 2
     Of a thing likely to cause mischief if it escapes​
    • It’s not the escape itself that must be likely, but that a mischief is likely if the thing that is brought onto land escapes
    • CAMBRIDGE WATER - any damage caused by an escape had to be REASONABLY FORESEEABLE otherwise it will be too remote and unrecoverable.
  • Stage 3
    Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land​
    • Extraordinary & unusual not domestic or normal​
    • D has brought something onto their property that was not naturally there, or non-natural use due to quantity or volume - RYLANDS
    • CAMBRIDGE WATER – non-natural use​
    • TRANSCO – natural use so not liable
  • Stage 4
    And it does escape and causes damage
    • Stored item must escape from one property onto the adjoining property
    • RYLANDS v FLETCHER 1868 – Liable as water escaped​
    • READ & LYONS – Not liable shell didn’t escape​
    • STANNARD & GORE – Not liable as tyres didn’t escape
  • Defences
    Act of a Third Party (Stranger)
    • RICKARDS V LOTHIAN 1913 – D not liable as it was a 3rd party who turned on the tap to allow the water to escape
    Act of God
    • Escape due to natural causes that no human foresight could have guarded against
    Statutory Authority​GREEN v CHELSEA WATERWORKS COThe D’s not liable if they are obliged by statute to do something.​
      GREEN v CHELSEA WATERWORKS CO
  • Remedies
    SAME AS NUISANCE