Qualitative data offers more richness of detail than quantitative data. It gives respondents the opportunity to fully report their thought, feelings and opinions.
Qualitative data tends to have greater external validity.
Qualitative data is often difficult to analyse. As a consequence, conclusions often rely on the subjective interpretations of the researcher and these may be subject to bias.
Quantitative data is relatively simple to analyse and tends to be more objective.
Quantitative data is much narrower in meaning and detail and may fail to represent ‘real life’.
Primary data requires time and effort.
Primary data can be designed in such a way that they specifically target the information that the researcher requires.
Secondary data may be inexpensive and easily accessed. The desired information may already exist.
Secondary data may be out of date or incomplete or not quite match the researcher’s needs or objectives. This may challenge the validity of any conclusions.