Cards (6)

    • Evolutionary theory of physical attractiveness
      > Shackelford and Larsen found that people with symmetrical faces are rated as more attractive.
      > This is because it may be an honest signal of genetic fitness as it is difficult to fake facial symmetry
      > Women with neotenous (baby face) features such as wide eyes and a small nose are seen as more attractive because they trigger a protective and caring instinct which is valuable resource for females wanting to reproduce
    • The matching hypothesis
      > Walster et al suggests that we look for partners who are like ourselves in terms of physical attractiveness, instead of choosing the most appealing people
      > Berscheid et al replicated a piece of research called 'The computer dance' where participants were asked to choose their own dance partner from people of varying degrees of physical attractiveness
    • The matching hypothesis 2
      > It was found participants chose partners who 'matched' them in physical attractiveness
      > Therefore, we seek partners whose attractiveness is similar to our own as we risk being rejected if we select someone who is much more attractive
    • Physical attractiveness AO3
      :) RTS evolutionary processes - Cunningham et al
      > Many similarities across cultures when studying physical attractiveness
      > Large eyes, prominent cheekbones, small nose and high eyebrows were rated attractive by Hispanic and Asian males
      > This therefore means it is possible to generalise findings from western cultures to non-western cultures as they have displayed similarities when investigating evolutionary explanations
    • Physical attractiveness AO3
      :( RTC Matching hypothesis Taylor
      > They studied the activity logs of a popular dating site. This was a real-life test of the matching hypothesis because it measured actual date choices and not just preferences
      > Online daters sought partners who were more physically attractive then them
      > Therefore, lowering the validity of the matching hypothesis as a factor that affects attraction in romantic relationships, as it contradicts the prediction about matching attractiveness
    • Physical attractiveness AO3
      :( Research is correlational
      > Cause and effect cannot be established between physical attractiveness and levels of attraction in romantic relationships
      > There could be another intervening factor impacting the attraction within the romantic relationship such as, the amount of time partners spend together
      > Limiting the support and internal validity of the research into physical attractiveness as a factor affecting attraction in romantic relationships.