Durkheim: crime can strengthen collective values, enable social change, act as a safety valve and act as a warning device
Merton: strain, or not being able to meet shared goals of society due to eg blocked opportunities, leads to crime individual response
Cohen: status frustration can lead to the formation of delinquent subcultures, with alternative status hierarchies explains group crime, and non-utilitarian
Miller: criticises Cohen arguing that working class boys do not subscribe to mainstream values in the first place working class subculture
Cloward and Ohlin: unequal access to illegitimate opportunities and three types of subculture - retreatist, conflict and criminal
Chambliss: law favours the ruling class eg in protection of private property
Snider: capitalist state rarely passes health and safety laws
Chambliss: one law for the rich, one for the poor - selective law enforcement
Taylor et al: 'fully social' theory of deviance needed combining both interactionism and Marxism
Hall et al: moral panic about black crime
Cicourel: police treated youths who they perceived as being from a 'good' background (white and middle class) more leniently
Lemert: primary and secondary deviance
Young: hippy drug users in Notting Hill had deviant careers
Braithwaite: disintegrative and reintegrative labelling
Heidensohn: criminology is 'malestream'
Lea and Young: main causes of crime are marginalisation, subcultures and relative deprivation
Young: individualism also explains crime
Murray: poor socialisation and control causes crime
Cornish and Clarke: people make rational; choices to commit crimes
Katz: pleasures and seductions of individuals cause crime (postmodernist)