high control of evs and cvs- cause and effect relationships`
standardised methods, replicable, reliable
however lack mundane realism thus eco val
overall help to establish psychology as a science, producing general laws of behaviour and gives psychology scientific rigour
+= establishes general laws and principles
certain norms and standards of behaviour eeg average IQ being 100, norms act as a good baseline comparison for mental disorders or intellectual abilities
thus can help with diagnosis and treaments eg IDD needs IQ below 70 for diagnosis, thus can gain treatment, return to work, benefit economy
limitation
undervalues impact of individual differences and individual experiences
nomothetic approach critised for 'losing the whole person'
mental disorders very subjective to an individual and must be studied individually in order to gain right treatment to improve the QOL of an individual
eg causes of depression can differ from low levels of serotonin to periods of grief or environmental factors
Therefore, the nomothetic approach, from this standpoint, has done little to improve people’s lives in comparison to the idiographic approach.
nomothetic and idiographic
Nomothetic and idiographic approaches may be complementary to each other, rather than contradictory
For example, Milton and Davis suggests that research should start with a nomothetic approach and once general laws have been produced the focus should switch to an idiographic approach to develop our understanding and theories.
Therefore, either approach can be used depending on the aims and nature of the research.