free will and determinism

Cards (18)

  • Free will
    The notion that humans can make choices and their behaviour/thoughts are not determined by biological or external forces
  • Determinism
    The view that an individual's behaviour is shaped or controlled by internal or external forces rather than an individual's will to do something
  • Hard determinism
    The view that all behaviour is caused by something (internal or external factors), so free will is an illusion
  • Soft determinism
    The view that behaviour may be predictable (caused by internal/external factors) but there is also room for personal choice from a limited range of possibilities (restricted free will)
  • Biological determinism
    The belief that behaviour is caused by biological (genetic, hormonal, evolutionary) influences that we cannot control
  • Environmental determinism
    The belief that behaviour is caused by features of the environment (such as systems of reward and punishment) that we cannot control
  • Psychic determinism
    The belief that behaviour is caused by unconscious psychodynamic conflicts that we cannot control
  • the free will-determinism debate
    • biological approach - internal
    • behaviourist approach - external
    • humanistic approach - embraces concept of free will
  • AO3 free-will - strength
    P: free will has practical value
    E: Roberts - looked at adolescents who strongly believed in fatalism (lives decided outside their control). Adolescents were at signif. greater risk of developing depression
    E: people who exhibit external locus of control are less likely to be optimistic and decreases their mental health
    L: Even if we don't have free will the fact we believe it may have a positive impact on mind and behaviour
  • AO3 free will - limitation
    P: brain scan evidence does not support it but does support determinism
    E: Libet - instructed ppts to choose a random moment to flick their wrist while he measured activity in their brain
    ppts had to say when they felt the conscious will to move -> unconscious brain activity leading up to the conscious decision to move came around half a second before the ppts decided to move
    L: most basic experiences of free will are actually determine by our brain before we are aware of them
  • AO3 determinism - limitation
    p: is the position of the legal system of responsibility
    E: hard determinism = individual choice is not the cause of behaviour
    court of law - offenders are held responsible for their actions - exercised free will in committing the crime
    L: in real-world determinist arguments do not work
  • key concepts free will
    • self-determining
    • free to choose thoughts and actions
    • does not deny there may be biological and environmental forces that exert influence but implies that we reject these forces
    • humanistic approach
  • key concepts hard determinism
    • fatalism
    • all human behaviour has cause that we can identify and describe
    • dictated by internal or external forces that we cannot control
  • key concepts soft determinism
    • cognitive approach
    • humans can make rational conscious choices
  • key concepts biological determinism
    • biological approach
    • e.g autonomic nervous system on the stress response
  • key concepts environmental determinism
    • e.g Skinner - free will is an illusion and argued all behaviour is the result of conditioning
    • reward and punishment influences behaviour
  • key concepts psychic determinism
    • e.g freud - free will is an illusion and emphasises the influence of biological drives and instincts
    • human behaviour - unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood
    • no such things as an accident e.g slip of the tongue
  • The scientific emphasis on causal explanations (free will v determinism)
    science = every event in the universe has a cause and that causes can be explained using general laws - allows scientists to predict and control events in the future
    psychology = lab experiment is the ideal of science as it enables researchers to demonstrate causal relationships