Save
Ethics
Meta-ethics
Prescriptivism
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Libby Griffiths
Visit profile
Cards (13)
Key Scholar:
R.M Hare
Philosopher R.M Hare produced a meta-ethical theory that sought to make moral values
objective.
Non-cognitive
and
anti-realist
theory
R.M Hare
agreed with
A.J Ayer
(emotivism) that there is no such thing as moral fact, but disagrees on what moral values are and what they do.
"The main point of moral judgement is to guide
conduct.
For example: stealing is wrong implies the
imperative
(don't steal)'' - R.M Hare
Ethical/moral statements are not just expressions of our
feelings.
Moral language is also
prescriptive
Moral judgements are action
guiding.
They prescribe what to do.
Hare argues when we use ethical language we are
fore-scribing
what to do or recommending a course of
action.
The prescribed courses of action must be
universal.
When we say something is wrong, we
universalise
that statement.
Moral judgements are
meaningful
when they can apply to
everyone
in a similar situation (universal).
Strengths
Straight forward = moral statements can also have some influence on others.
If moral commands are
universal
, they are applicable to all and thus easy to follow.
It solves the emotivist issue of moral language being
meaningless.
- Instead they are prescribed actions.
Weaknesses
J.L
Mackie
rejects the idea that morals are
objective
and
universal.
"Do unto others as you would have done unto yourself."