offender profiling

Cards (27)

  • offender profiling - making assumptions about characteristics of offender through careful analysis of their offence
  • top down approach - profilers use their intuition and experience to categorise offenders into disorganised and organised
  • top down approach - use crime scene evidence to do this
  • organised - plan their own crime, bring weapons, tidy crime scene and hides the body, average/higher intelligence
  • disorganised - reckless, untidy, spontaneous, leaves evidence on the crime scene, reflects below level intelligence
  • TOP DOWN RESSLER
    created definitions of organised and disorganised with interviews of serial killers
  • TOP DOWN RESSLER FINDINGS
    24 organised
    12 disorganised
    distinct 'types' of offender
  • CRIT OF RESSLER
    restricted sample of 36
    not generalisable
  • CANTER TOP DOWN APPROACH
    review of 100 US serial killers
  • CANTER TOP DOWN APPROACH FINDINGS
    disorganised features are rare and does not form distinct type
    false dichotomy between two types
  • BOTTOM UP APPROACH
    evidence base approach using statistical analysis of data collection from crime scenes
  • bottom up approach - types of info collected is choice of victim and location
    can be referred to as investigative psychology
  • factors in bottom down approach - five factor model
  • FIVE FACTOR MODEL
    interpersonal coherence - interactions same in personal life
  • FIVE FACTOR MODEL (t+p)
    time and place significance
  • FIVE FACTOR MODEL (c characteristics)
    criminal characteristics
  • FIVE FACTOR MODEL (c career)
    criminal career
  • FIVE FACTOR MODEL (f.a)
    forensic awareness (knowledge of police techniques)
  • geographical profiling - branch of investigative psychology focused on where offender is based , helps narrow search areas
  • LEAST EFFORT PRINCIPLE - closest suitable crime scene to home base means fewer crimes will be further away.
  • circle hypothesis - crimes radiate out of their home base creating a circle of crime
  • CARTER AND LARKIN SUPPORT BOTTOM UP APPROACH
    87% of 45 British sexual assaulters = mauraders - supports circle hypothesis and idea that choice of place of crime is significant factor in offender behaviour
  • bottom up approach limitation - diff to know if criminal is maurader or commuter before it is learnt
  • bottom up limitation - difficult to separate offender, not all offences recorded
  • positive bottom up - makes inferences with statistical analysis from published research and so more scientific
  • limitation top down approach - relies on intuition and experience of individual criminal profilers
  • negative of both - suffer from the problem of statistically abnormal offenders. cannot match to statistical analysis or what is expected through intuition