offender profiling - making assumptions about characteristics of offender through careful analysis of their offence
top down approach - profilers use their intuition and experience to categoriseoffenders into disorganised and organised
top down approach - usecrime scene evidence to do this
organised - plan their own crime, bring weapons, tidy crime scene and hides the body, average/higherintelligence
disorganised - reckless, untidy, spontaneous, leaves evidence on the crime scene, reflects below level intelligence
TOP DOWN RESSLER
created definitions of organised and disorganised with interviews of serial killers
TOP DOWN RESSLER FINDINGS
24organised
12disorganised
distinct'types' of offender
CRIT OF RESSLER
restricted sample of 36
not generalisable
CANTER TOP DOWN APPROACH
review of 100 US serialkillers
CANTER TOP DOWN APPROACH FINDINGS
disorganised features are rare and does not form distinct type
false dichotomy between two types
BOTTOM UP APPROACH
evidence base approach using statistical analysis of data collection from crime scenes
bottom up approach - types of info collected is choice of victim andlocation
can be referred to as investigative psychology
factors in bottom down approach - five factor model
FIVE FACTOR MODEL
interpersonal coherence - interactions same in personal life
FIVE FACTOR MODEL (t+p)
time and placesignificance
FIVE FACTOR MODEL (c characteristics)
criminal characteristics
FIVE FACTOR MODEL (c career)
criminal career
FIVE FACTOR MODEL (f.a)
forensic awareness (knowledge of policetechniques)
geographical profiling - branch of investigative psychology focused on where offender is based , helps narrowsearchareas
LEAST EFFORT PRINCIPLE - closestsuitable crime scene to home base means fewercrimes will be furtheraway.
circle hypothesis - crimes radiate out of their home base creating a circle of crime
CARTER AND LARKIN SUPPORT BOTTOM UP APPROACH
87% of 45British sexual assaulters = mauraders - supports circle hypothesis and idea that choice of place of crime is significant factor in offender behaviour
bottom up approach limitation - diff to know if criminal is maurader or commuterbefore it is learnt
bottom up limitation - difficult to separateoffender, not all offences recorded
positive bottom up - makes inferences with statistical analysis from publishedresearch and so more scientific
limitation top down approach - relies on intuition and experience of individualcriminalprofilers
negative of both - suffer from the problem of statistically abnormal offenders. cannotmatch to statistical analysis or what is expected through intuition