claim basic gender identity (labelling) is enough for child to identify themselves and take control in gender behaviours
suggest how schemas affect late behaviour
schemas
learned from interactions with ithers as well as media
related to cultural norms
function - organising info presented to children
learn about gender appropriate behaviour
ingroup and outgroup schemas
ingroup - group with which person identifies (eg, female)
positive evaluation of ingroup, negative of outgroup
why? enhances self esteem
seeks info about what ingroup does (ingroup schemas)
resilience of gender beliefs
fixed gender attitudes
ignore any info not consistent with ingroup info
peer relationships
playing with other children leads to belief that all girls share same interests and all boys share same interests
same sex peers are 'like me'
develop knowledge of consequences of being associated with diff social relationships - teased for playing w opposite sex
gender schemas without constancy
Martin and Little
children start gaining info on schemas before stability
under 4, no signs of stability or constancy
despite lack of constancy, displayed strong gender stereotypes
shows children gained info on gender roles before Kohlberg suggested, in line with GST
gender identity even earlier
evidence children can label gender group earlier than indicated
Zosuls et found recorded samples of child language and observed at play
children started using gender labels at 19 months
suggests age related predictions of GST may be incorrect
gender schemas organise memory
if gender schemas are important, so children pay greater attention consistent with schemas and recall this info better
Martin and Halverson
found when children asked to recall pictures of people, under 6 year olds recalled more gender consistent (eg. male firefighter) than gender inconsistent (eg. male nurse)
so, gender schemas relate to memory and are important
gender schemas may distort info
distortion of inconsistent info
Martin and Halverson
children shown inconsistent pictures (counter stereotypical), they distorted info
eg. if shown boy w doll, they described a girl w doll
to maintain ingroup schemas
support GST, show how behaviour can be explained w schemas