I can never experience things as you do – I do not even know whether when we both call something 'blue' or 'sweet' that the experience you have – the 'what it feels like to me' is the same as mine
No one gives an unvarnished description of an event – the act of putting it into words is itself an act of interpretation, a translation with all the attendant difficulties
(according to Rudolph Otto) an experience so far beyond the normal range of human existence, experienced on the emotional level and leaving the person aware of their own smallness in the face of an all-powerful God
Albert Einstein: 'The most beautiful thing that we can experience is the mysterious and that this knowledge and feeling is the centre of true religiousness'
Kant rejected the possibility of such experiences as he argued that we do not have the senses to experience God as God belongs to the noumenal realm and is not an object in space and time
Some people have suggested that indirect experiences are not necessarily different from ordinary experiences; they are made significant by the person who has the experience and for who the experience has religious meaning
Others have been more sceptical, arguing that people were already inclined to behave in such a way because they had already chosen and evangelical and charismatic form of faith
Some critics pointed to the way in which an atmosphere had already built-up within the congregation through prayers, hymns and preaching about the work of the spirit
In the Acts of the Apostles, the Apostles, after their Pentecost experience, go out to the assembled crowds and speak to them in such a way that every member of the crowd, regardless of this own language, can hear and understand the message