many members of public see RJ as a soft option for dealing with offenders ,even though its use would reduce recidivism
estimated evert £1 spent on RJ we would save £8 on reduced reoffending
however, politicians are not keen to promote its use in fear of losing publicsupport who prefer criminals to face retribution for their crimes as considered a more fair approach
flexible
unlike custodial sentencing, RJ can be used flexibily, adapting to suit the needs of each situation
however, this makes it difficult to conclude the effectiveness as standardised procedures are not used consistently meaning findings lack reliability when aiming to support restorative justice
limitation- remorse
it is possible the offender only signs up to RJ as a way of reducing their sentence or to avoid prison and thus do not show genuine remorse
the victim may also only be interested in seeking revenge
thus the proccess may not have the benefits it claims and does not prevent reoffending